I heard something to do with Nitrogen and …cow farts(?) I am really unsure of this and would like to learn more.

Answer -

4 Parts

  • Ethical reason for consuming animals
  • Methane produced by cows are a harmful greenhouse gas which is contributing to our current climate crisis
  • Health Reasons - there is convincing evidence that processed meats cause cancer
  • it takes a lot more calories of plant food to produce the calories we would consume from the meat.

Details about the answers are in the comments

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If something can’t be harmed there no need to prevent harming it.

    i don’t really like your use of harm here to exclude everything but sentient beings, but as a term of art, for the purposes of this discussion, i will indulge you.

    why does it matter if something CAN be harmed? what creates a duty to NOT HARM something?

    • neuralnerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      what creates a duty to NOT HARM something?

      About all ethics is about reducing harm. If you don’t know that harming is bad I don’t think we can have a discussion.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        deontological ethics are explicitly not about that. divine command theory is unconcerned with that. can you name an ethical system that does concern itself with that?

        • neuralnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          deontological ethics are explicitly not about that.

          I guess it depends on the philosopher, but at least one includes “doing no harm” in the obligations[1]:

          Ross [20] modified Kant’s deontology, allowing a plurality of duty-based ethical principles, such as doing no harm, promise keeping, etc.

          can you name an ethical system that does concern itself with that?

          Probably all consequentialism and at least utilitarianism (harm decreases the global well being). Negative consequentialism is more specifically focused on reducing suffering/harm.