The FAA is still awaiting the report that will detail the steps SpaceX will have to implement before it can try to launch its Starship again.

  • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    As much as I’d like to see another attempt… Good on the FAA.

    That launch was dangerous. Huge chunks of concrete were projected up to 6.5 miles away from the launch site.

    They either significantly miscalculated the expected damage to the launch pad, or knew and did it anyway. Both are pretty bad.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Huge chunks” were not projected 6.5 miles away, that’s ridiculous. Pulverized concrete, aka dust, got thrown that far away.

    • TekAzurik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They knew it would happen. The engineering here is well established and has been for decades. Musk even tweeted that not having a flame diverter “might be a mistake”. Willful negligence.

    • cassetti@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure it was intentional. I can’t find it now but there was a decision by Elno to not add the water systems to the launch pad which would have prevented the pad from being destroyed. They knew it would get damaged so decided not to mitigate the problem.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed. They were planning to rip out and replace the pad anyway, and believed that they’d at least get one launch out of the existing one, so they saw no reason to delay. If they’d waited for the new pad to be installed they would only just be gearing up for their first test flight right now. They’ve had four months to refine the rocket’s design based on the data they got from the first test launch.

        They misjudged the robustness of the original launch pad, but only somewhat. IMO the much more serious misjudgement was their flight termination system, they blew holes in the ship’s tanks when it started tumbling out of control and it took something like 40 seconds for the ship to finally disintegrate after that. That was a situation where they underestimated the robustness of their systems. The new flight termination system is much more powerful.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, one of the main proximate causes of the failure to achieve orbit was that the concrete rebounded into the engines because Musk thought they could get away with not using blast mitigation