Essentially the apps have same package name but different signatures and the app store that installed it should be the only one to recognize and update it.

But Google is likely trying this dark pattern to sway people away from F-Droid or alt stores by making users uninstall these apps and install it from the Google Play Store.

It’s been going on for a while and is annoying af.

https://android.stackexchange.com/questions/253727/why-is-googles-play-store-suddenly-trying-to-update-apps-installed-via-f-droid

  • Stez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s just cause it has the same package name and only checks the signature on attempt to install not cause Google has some alterior motive

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s relatively new behaviour so they introduced it recently. And they need to fix it, but ignore it entirely…

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Even if it’s new behavior, there is really no reason to assume that this was done to evoke some dark pattern or other. It just shows that Google will not think about 3rd party stores when they do anything with their services and that is hardly news, is it? Besides: I kinda get it honestly. If they’d take all the stuff out there for android into account before they did anything, nothing would be done at all.

        So the question becomes less why that’s there, but more what stores like Samsung do to prevent this issue and if F-Droid can adapt the same behavior.

      • Martin@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Mismatched signatures have been discouraged since day one of Android. A mismatched signature is a sign that some one other than the original publisher built this package, and the user needs to be aware that it might be malicious.

        That F-Droid went with this setup with mismatched signatures was always going to make their apks look suspicious.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You misunderstood the whole situation. The signatures are all fine. Google Play Store is trying to override an app installed from F-Droid. If the two stores had the same signature, the play store would be able to do this which would go completely counter to the user’s choice (they installed from F-Droid for a reason). It’s a good thing the signatures don’t match, there’s nothing suspicious about it.

          It used to be that the play store just wouldn’t show updates to apps that it wasn’t actually able to update. They broke this behaviour.

          • Norgur@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, it’s not a good thing. The solution would be to use a different package name for the f droid version. That’s what’s supposed to be done. It’s not the signature or Google that’s causing the problem. It’s that there are two packages with identical names that should not be identical.

  • IDew@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Since I found out about F-Droid and Aurora Store, I’m actively dodging the Play Store. No one will ever make me use it. Ads, promos, junk everywhere! And their shitty way of updating.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t care that it can’t update these apps, since I use Obtainium. But, FFS, at least let users have an option to ignore or hide those apps.

  • uuhhhhmmmm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    But Google is likely trying this dark pattern to sway people away from F-Droid or alt stores by making users uninstall these apps and install it from the Google Play Store.

    No, it’s the security measure. Anyone can use existing package ID. If the user installs a different app with the same package ID as the other, that new app just overwrites the old app and will have access to the sensitive data of it.

    F-Droid apps are built and signed by the people at F-Droid. Apps from Google Play and GitHub are built and signed by the developers themselves. You can update Google Play apps from GitHub and vice versa. That’s why I use Obtainium over F-Droid.

  • Cloudless ☼@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah the worst part of it is that the version on Google Play is actually the older version.

    They are shown on the update page for Google’s benefits only. This is anti customer.

    • Stez@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not though it’s because the developers use the same package name for the f-droid and play store versions but when the play store checks the signature before installing it sees it doesn’t match and it fails if the developers used different package names for play store and f-droid this would not be an issue