Which game is it and what did you not like about it?

  • Uprise42@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole genre is overplayed. Apples to apples was great for kids, cards sold well because of the adult themes but even now it’s a pretty cringe game. Everything else is riding the same wave with no originality added to the concept.

    • Kerred@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel there is still life in it, like with Superfight. It encourages debating to the judge and pairs cards directly with each other granting more interaction.

      But it is a shame Superfight seems to be dwarfed by other mass market games.

      • Uprise42@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Super fight is a fun spin on the genre, as it Dixit. Keep in mind they mix things up though, rather than rebrand apple to apples.

        Superfight doesn’t have a prompt to answer. It is pairing cards and having groups dictate.

        Dixit is actually something I’ve noticed people with autism enjoy. My cousin is autistic and we played a demo at a LGS and she loved it because she could pick the hint freely. She could tell a poem, or pick one word, or even a song. She loved mixing it up. So we got her a. Copy for Christmas with a couple expansion packs.

        She went to a group home with other autistic children a couple times a week to help with socialization. She took her game once and it was a very popular game. The workers there said everyone loved it.

        Both of those games introduce a twist to the genre. The change the rules. That’s what makes them fun. Whereas Mysterium and Obscurio I would say don’t fall into the genre because it’s not a judge of what card fits better. It’s a series of hints to an answer. Those games have a correct answer where others do not.