- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The Times unraveled a financial network that stretches from Chicago to Shanghai and uses American nonprofits to push Chinese talking points worldwide.
You must log in or register to comment.
On the surface, No Cold War is a loose collective run mostly by American and British activists who say the West’s rhetoric against China has distracted from issues like climate change and racial injustice.
In fact, a New York Times investigation found, it is part of a lavishly funded influence campaign that defends China and pushes its propaganda. At the center is a charismatic American millionaire, Neville Roy Singham, who is known as a socialist benefactor of far-left causes.
…
Mr. Singham says he does not work at the direction of the Chinese government. But the line between him and the propaganda apparatus is so blurry that he shares office space — and his groups share staff members — with a company whose goal is to educate foreigners about “the miracles that China has created on the world stage.”
If he’s so socialist and far-left, why in the world would he support China? They’re politically communist in name only, and economically capitalist.
Well even though I’m old enough where I should have already known this term, my time on lemmy has introduced me to Tankies.
My guess is this guy is a Tankie: if it has communism in it in any way shape or form then it’s the most amazing thing ever and anything you say about it that would say otherwise is a dirty liberal lie.
Something like that.
Sounds like a perfect fit, claim to be socialist actually just be a greedy capitalist.
Is this illegal?
No, but it’s scummy as fuck, and it’s interesting that an American is pushing Chinese talking points.
I think people are pretty well aware at this point that social engineering, on a macroscale, is extremely effective at changing people’s views (albeit slowly). Look at what happened with Qanon, look how many people supported that. That was the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen, and people are STILL backing it even after it’s been proven to not only be a sham, but run by a pedophile out of Southeast Asia. Imagine the damage that can be done by a disinformation or social engineering campaign backed by one of the largest nations in the world.
We are currently in a culture war - the implications of it could change everyone’s lives in the next couple of decades if we aren’t careful.
Doesn’t the U.S. do this in other countries? If America does it, and it’s not illegal, why can’t China? Weird that they didn’t mention that it’s legal in the article, right?
No one said they can’t. But we can and should call out propaganda for what it is. Especially when it comes from authoritarian, genocidal, despotic governments.
This exchange reminds me of a key and peele sketch. Not illegal, but perfectly fine to admonish china for doing the thing that the us is constantly being admonished for, mx. Whataboutism.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/azoE0bZSoGA
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
deleted by creator
K&P are funny. It definitely is whataboutism. And China shouldn’t do it. But The NY Times fails to mention that it’s not illegal and other countries do this too. Is that good journalism?
Its the NYT’s when on the last 10-15 years have they been anything close to “journalists”?
But democracy dies in darkness. /s
Edit: That’s the Washington Post.
it’s interesting that an American is pushing Chinese talking points
Maybe he just agrees with it? What is it about Americans that they wouldn’t be convinced of other perspectives? Americans can only align with US propaganda?
Ok, Mr Singham
I think with evidence provided that they should have to register under FARA as foreign agents for China here to spread Chinese propaganda. I’m sure the writer of the article informed them.
This is just another reason to add to the many as to why (if you ask me) we need to both
a. To kill off the rich and…
b. Kill off the CCP.
Two wicked groups colluding against the common interests of keeping the world alive just so they can remain in power.
I’d argue the CCP certainly doesn’t care about keeping the planet alive. They care about keep those who are currently in power comfortable until they die, then I doubt they give a shit what happens.
