jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoISPs can charge extra for fast gaming under FCC’s Internet rules, critics sayarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1385arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1380arrow-down1external-linkISPs can charge extra for fast gaming under FCC’s Internet rules, critics sayarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square44fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareOsaErisXero@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·7 months agoThe correct answer in that scenario is C should be paying for it, as in the stated scenario C’s traffic would be exceeding the peering arrangement with B and/or A, but there were/are a number of reasons that breaks down in the real world.
The correct answer in that scenario is C should be paying for it, as in the stated scenario C’s traffic would be exceeding the peering arrangement with B and/or A, but there were/are a number of reasons that breaks down in the real world.