• Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The terms of that license seem like a non-commercial AI would be just fine to use it, is that not intended?

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The terms of that license seem like a non-commercial AI would be just fine to use it, is that not intended?

      IANAL, but I think its the citation stuff that would have to obeyed, which is far as I know bots today never give citation of where they’re modeling from when they post comments, so I’m hoping since they’re not citing they’d stop using.

      I saw somebody else doing it, I figured it couldn’t hurt, one copy and paste and I’m done.

      CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Typically the citation is included with the software, possibly linked from a site / service and/or included in their dataset repo (e.g. on huggingface.co)

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          True, but they still have to cite my name, and I’m not sure they’re going to name every person that they use every one of their comments to train their models from.

          Granted it relies on them honoring the license, but still easy thing to try.

          CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

          • Match!!@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            From a look at the metadata for, for example, LAION 5B, the attribution (as well as the license when present) is scraped along with the datat