• Djtecha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes, it should even have to exist. But crazy judges think you have to be in a religion to be protected from other religions.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So, there’s a lot of confusion about what TST is and what it does.

      TST exists as a church for Satanism. Its activism is (primarily) based around fighting for the rights of Satanists.

      If TST didn’t need to fight for the rights of Satanists, it would still need to exist for every other reason that a church exists.

      • Djtecha@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        We’re talking about the satanic temple here right? It’s just a cooler version of pastafarism. That does community outreach mainly to battle the Christian bullshit.

            • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              They don’t believe in a supernatural power, but they see themselves as a serious religion with serious beliefs. From your link:

              ‘[Satanism is] a narrative structure by which we contextualize our lives and works. …[it is] a body of symbolism and religious practice — a sense of identity, culture, community, and shared values.’

              They have seven Tenets, none of which are directly about other religions - although one does mention being opposed to ‘distorting scientific facts’. Most are about compassion and individuality.

              ‘Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought.’

              Agree with them or not, but they see themselves as much more than some kind of shell religion to undermine Religious Exemption statutes

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                The thing is, I don’t see how the seven tenets should conflict with modern religions at all. It’s fully compatible with what Christianity claims to be. By all logic, following the Satanic tenets should make you a better Christian, a better human

                • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Christianity does not believe in bodily autonomy (tenet 3) or having your beliefs conform to the best scientific evidence (tenet 5). Even if it were 100% compatible with Christianity, though, that still wouldn’t make it a parody religion.

              • Djtecha@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Well I do agree with them, I am a member. My point is they don’t believe in western religious tenants like gods and afterlife. Also I’m pretty sure they were founded in a rebuttal to the scotus opinion that athesim isn’t a religion and thus doesn’t deserve religious protections.

                • Kellamity@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  they don’t believe in western religious tenants like gods and afterlife

                  Yeah, but their whole point is that this doesn’t undermine their status as a religion. It doesn’t make them ‘a joke or parody religion’, which is the phrase you initially replied to:

                  This is a common misconception. TST is not a joke or parody religion.

                  What makes you say that?

                  They don’t exist as a semi-serious troll organisation to undermine Christianity is my point, they take their beliefs and religious status seriously.

                  • Djtecha@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I never said they were a joke. You’re the one disregarding pastafarism here.

                  • Djtecha@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Ahh I see you believe I implied that. No that wasn’t my intent. My point is they were created to combat religious encroachment on secular society. Let’s not act like they are performing mass here though. They exist as a tool to rebuff religion. Not sure that makes them a religion, but I’m no theologian.

                • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Which SCOTUS decision is that?

                  Atheism itself isn’t a religion; it’s just non-belief. You can have an atheistic religion, however.

    • Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      So it’s the fact that it is needed that is bad, not the thing itself. If it’s helping the problem I’d call that a good thing. Like medical care, or firefighting.