I want to take back ‘Retard’. Because I want it to apply to things that are infuriatingly stupid, instead of it being used as a derogatory term towards special needs people.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why not just call those things infuriating, bad, counterproductive, ruinous, negligent, futile, aggravating, or shitty?

    “Retarded” originated as a medical euphemism for what is now sometimes called “developmental delay”: some kid didn’t learn to walk or talk or read or behave himself by the usual age. As a verb, “to retard” is “to slow down”; it’s cognate to “tardy” meaning “late for class”.

    The original sense of “retarded” was about people with disabilities.

    It was only used as a slang insult among schoolchildren because their teachers were using it as a medically descriptive term: “Be patient with Kevin; he’s retarded.”

    The point of calling your friend Billy “a retard” as an insult was that you were comparing him to Kevin. The point of calling the school rules “retarded” was that you were comparing them to Kevin.

    The whole reason that you think “retarded” can mean “infuriatingly stupid” is that Kevin flails and babbles because of his disability, and you’re used to being infuriated by him instead of being patient with him like the teacher told you to.

    You getting to use “retard” to mean something other than a disability insult is not “reclaiming” a slur, unless you were yourself a kid “with special needs”.

    Reclaiming a slur is when the gay activist group calls itself Queer Nation, not when a straight person decides they want to say “queer” as a generic insult.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You made me look up the etymology and NGL I always thought it must be from “en retard”, late, for some reason. Like because if you’re late you’re delayed and “retarded people” have developmental delays or something. The real etymology kind of makes more sense though.

      • fiat_lux@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not wrong either, it does ultimately derive from Latin ‘tardus’ meaning ‘late’, it just took a slight detour in French.

    • throwsbooks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the thing about the word “retard” is that it’s not so much about something being aggravating as it is about something being absolutely stupid. It has these hard consonants that make it sound powerful when it’s said. It’s effective, and it’s really uncomfortable to hear. It’s the fuck of the moron/idiot family of words.

      And we’ve got this reality where there’s variability in how smart people are. And then people with developmental delays get tossed into the extreme end of the scale with medical terminology, and so that gives people an easy word to use when someone is acting on the extreme end of “not smart”. And then the word becomes a slur, and then a new word gets coined that’s medical and not a slur, and then it gets co-opted as a slur, and so on.

      And it’s not gonna stop, because sometimes you do gotta call out someone for making stupid decisions, especially when their idiocy is causing harm. It’s just we’ve also got assholes around, but those people will insult more than just someone’s brain, they’ll go for anything that hurts.

  • Kikkertje@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would like triggered and ptsd back please. Both words have lost their meaning and as a person suffering from cptsd it’s infuriating.

  • Nonameuser678@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look if you’re not disabled or special needs you really don’t have any right to reclaim this word in any sense. This is the equivalent of trying to reclaim the n word as a white person. It’s just incredibly inappropriate and insensitive. Also, can I just say, your definition of repurposing this word is incredibly problematic because you’re actually still just using it to mean the same thing it was originally intended to mean. And it’s incredibly offensive, just so you know. So please don’t use this word.

    And frankly as a person with a cognitive disability, our community really isn’t keen on repurposing the r word in any way so please don’t think you can just jump in and do this without consulting the people it impacts. Even if we had repurposed this word, it’s still offensive for non-disabled people to use it in the same way it’s offensive for white people to use the n word.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t use this as an adjective to describe a person, but I generally park my bread dough in the refrigerator to retard it. So my dough is retarded when I chill it.

      As a perjorative for a human being though? No, have not used that as an adult, though I don’t think “delayed” is any different, it has the same meaning. But it costs me nothing not to use it, so I don’t.

      What I would like to reclaim is the word “literally”. Why the fuck does it now seem to mean literally the opposite of literally.

    • Wazzamatter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ya I would never be able to reclaim it for myself. For my whole life it was used only as a strong negative.

      It’s the same for my wife and queer. It’s a word she can’t use to describe herself without thinking of old mystery books. “Well that’s quite queer”

  • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “conservative”

    Today people who self-identify as conservative are basically all assholes with a deep hatret towards dignity, humanity, society and nature. They’re proud to be assholes, they’re vice-signalling.

    But the actual word - “conservative” - it has lost all meaning. What are they “conserving”? They’re against environmentalism. I’d like to “conserve” nature so that future generations may still live on it. Am I now conservative? They want to burn everything down even the things they claim to uphold. They yell about freedom of speech and ban books at the same time. They shit on rules and all long-standing conventions, norms and just basic human tactfulness. What things are they “conserving”? The word has lost all meaning and means just bigoted loud asshole today.

  • wjrii@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Be careful. The word only took on its perjorative meaning because of the connection to various groups of special needs people. Before then, the noun form was pretty much nonexistent, and the adjective and verb forms were boring latinate terms meaning “slow(ed) down.”

    • karmiclychee @sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not enough people consider the origin of these words, trying to use them divorced from the thing that actually makes it a pejorative. Growing up, “gay” was another one people tried to use as an insult “non-homophobically”

      It’s poisonous for a reason

  • Albbi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pineapple. Just use ananas like the rest of the world.

    It’s not from a pine tree and it’s not an apple.

    • Wilker@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      not sure what “rest of the world” is because there’s so many languages. i know that portuguese calls it “abacaxi” (“xi” is pronounced “she”)

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah, there’s an old image showing this. I guess it’s not ananas in every language, but it is a lot of them!

        Here’s the image

        Portuguese is even on this list, but modified with (eu). What does that mean?

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably, like Spanish, that it has a separate language spun off in Latin America that’s “the same language” but only mostly. I think they branch more than, e.g., a southern dialect vs England, but I don’t know enough of the different versions to know if that’s real or not.

        • Wilker@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          EU means Europe (so european portuguese), which has a few more pronounced differences compared to brazilian portuguese compared to the difference between US english and UK english

    • vd1n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So ridiculous… I never used the term but understood it basically meaning “mindfulness and accepting humanity”.

      Then pop politics took it, stuck their chodes in it, fucked it, dragged it through the streets and shot it in the head.

      And not is basically a hate term for anyone that lives with respect towards humanity.

      But don’t get me wrong, I hated when people through it around as conveniently as “lit” or some shit like that.

      • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Awake (woke) to human needs, human rights, how broken capitalism is and humanity’s effect on the climate.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, no, the racists stole it from the black people fair and square, and you know they never give anything back to black people without first shitting on it.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would also like to roll in to work late and say “sorry, I woke up late” without getting accosted by Ron DeSantis but whachagonnado.

      Oh wait that probably isn’t what you meant. How long did the word have it’s original meaning? I feel like it was only a couple of years maximum before it got taken and broken.

      • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In mainstream culture, I feel like it had its original meaning from like 2014 until maybe 2021. Before that it was a part of black culture since like the 1930s. At least that’s what a cursory googling got me.

  • deaconblue@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Used to mean something else in the world of machinery and auto mechanics. Old school stuff. There is a screw that holds the distributor cap in place. A mechanic would loosen that screw and rotate the whole distributor cap very slightly, maybe 5° or so, the thing is round, so that’s a really small portion of a circle. So one could turn it clockwise or counterclockwise to advance or retard the timing.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I was a communications director, I used the term “retards” as in the following sentence: “This type of legislation retards progress on several key initiatives.”

    My boss made me take it out because it might offend people.

    Talk about the dumbing down of America…

    • infyrin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was watching a video from Technology Connections, about electric cars and the need to rethink their brake lights. He showed a document from the EU about regulations about car braking. In that document, the words ‘retardation’ and ‘retarding’ were both used, referencing braking. Pretty sure someone from America, if they were to see that, would be assuming ‘retardation’ is like a disease inflicted onto normal people and ‘retarding’ would be the transforming state into being a complete retard.

      This is why we can’t have nice things.

  • Spliffman1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Gay… I’m old enough to remember when it just meant happy… We even had to change a friend’s nickname when the usage changed … His name is Ben, and we called him Bengay at first (like the muscle rub) which shortened to Gay… We would literally refer to him as Gay and call him that in public with no problem… Then things changed and we couldn’t call him that anymore. I’d like Gay back

      • Spliffman1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        1961 and yes, but you don’t want me to list all the changes I’ve seen lol, that would be a few books, I just answered the question about a word change I’d like back, first one that came to mind, and now you are trying to provoke me into a boomer rant

  • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish “nonce” still just meant something used “never more than once” e.g. a cryptographic nonce.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole thing is ridiculous. “Mental retardation” was a technical, medical term.

    People started getting offended because it was being used as an insult. They didn’t understand that no matter what you name this condition, people will use it as an insult.

    That’s what happened with the medical terms “idiot” and “imbecile” as well.

    Even the term “special” got usurped. Remember when Obama slipped and made a joke about himself being in the Special Olympics?

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Dumb” and “lame” fall into that category as well. People who cannot speak aren’t stupid. People who cannot use their legs aren’t necessarily a bummer.

    • McScience@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The term for this is “the euphemism treadmill”. Basically every word we have for someone being unintelligent was at one point a medical term and for 100s or 1000s of years human beings have been making the same lame joke with whatever the current word is. We can get mad at people for doing it, but history shows it’s guaranteed to happen anyway.