Looks like Arrowhead might be moving forward with PSN despite “internal discussions”.

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    First their drm is based around the assumption that you’re a criminal, and now this. I’m kinda glad I didn’t buy it.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah same, bunch of my friends had been playing it for a week or two, but between the in game story, the season passes and the utterly intrusive DRM, I figured I’ll wait for a good sale at least. Well, guess I’ll be saving 100% on this, now!

      • This one made me wonder if they don’t get telemetrics about how people are playing the game to improve the game (or build a new game) from without doing this. And if that same data would be valuable to data brokers in general or if it’s more valuable as an internal trade secret.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They already have this data to improve the game. They basically have a DM watching everything and managing play. This is just for Sony.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          In my experience with telemetry, it’s100% about understanding how the product is performing and being used, and 0% about monitoring individual users. Telemetry data has little to no value for anyone not directly supporting the product.

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Holy F, what a smooth brain move. They had an IP with incredible goodwill that would have been printing money forever (think about DLCs and merchandise, maybe even a TV series), and they chose to destroy all that to increase the active PSN account numbers by <1%. Which doesn’t even have a direct financial benefit, just something they can peacock in their quarterly reports, trying to boost the stock price.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Adding all those helldiver’s players into the “Sony account to PlayStation now subscription service” sales funnel is the financial goal here, likely along with selling any data they collect about you to any bidder.

      This does make Sony money, but it likely doesn’t make them more than an indie becoming the 7th most successful game this year, but here we are anyway.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I understand that sales funnel logic, but I would still argue its actual financial impact would be marginal. It’s wishful thinking from Sony that just because you got your claws into a PC player by making a PSN account, they will start buying PS stuff. The data monetization is much more direct, but still, not much additional money to be made by a few (tens of / hundred) thousand extra registrations (especially as they had to be aware of refunds happening). These are definitely valid upsides, but I don’t think they are big/certain enough to make this call, and compensate for the negative consequences.

        My gut / experience tells me this is mostly about the PSN account numbers, and some execs getting a gazillion dollar bonus if they can push it above certain target by the next report, even if they damage the revenues in the process.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          My gut / experience tells me this is mostly about the PSN account numbers, and some execs getting a gazillion dollar bonus if they can push it above certain target by the next report, even if they damage the revenues in the process.

          I’m inclined to suspect the same. A move like this does not happen without a project “champion” pushing through internal resistance.

          I have seen exactly this kind of shortsighted min-maxing, where an exec will fixate on some metric or goal, and just wreck everything in their path.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    The accounts are so important that you’re willing to lose sales in that many countries?!

  • Kroxx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    To be fair there is a lot of speculation that the delisting is actually entirely from steam’s side not sony or arrowhead. Nothing is confirmed of course but the thought is that steam is throwing the kill switch on selling in these countries right now because obviously the publisher hadn’t thought this out and just straight up doesn’t have a plan for it. Valve may be doing this to put extra pressure on the situation drying up sales a little prematurely and more importantly to protect Valve from legal repercussions. Again this is entirely speculation but it makes a lot of sense, Arrowhead and Sony have been pretty quiet.

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Same old shit with everything. A company makes a move that users don’t like. The company just ignores all the flak they are getting online. The uproar calms down and then things continue.

      We’re seeing this more and more. Windows with ads, Amazon adding ads to their prime video account holders. Spotify moving lyrics to their premium subscription. The past couple of years are shit and companies continue to do whatever the fuck they want.

  • 2lama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I didn’t buy it before because it had kernel level anticheat which is incredibly invasive and unnecessary for a PVE game, and now I’m really glad I didn’t buy it.

  • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lmao, this was such a panic reaction by sony that they’ve banned all US territories as well multiple countries where PSN is active.

    They are so cooked that this isn’t even funny.

    • Adincar@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The actual answer is that everyone should play Earth Defence Force (they just announced EDF 6), which I feel was a big inspiration for helldivers 2 bugs.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        You don’t think Starship Troopers may have had an influence on either of those games?

        Because there’s actually a couple Starship Troopers games now.

        • Adincar@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh yeah definitely, Starship troopers is a huge influence to both, I don’t disagree at all, the Starship troopers games seem to be a bit more serious and gritty in comparison to edf though. I’d say the gameplay in helldivers is very EDF also with the huge big swarms and over the top weapons.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The more confusing thing is a change on February 8th, where they add a Russian edition to their game if I interpret it correctly.