• CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Fusion is coming, who cares about He3?

    SK had a 45 sec reaction, we might actually be less than 20 years away from net positive energy.

    Well, it would be except it isnt a money making energy source so TPTB will only fund space miners instead.

      • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fair enough, I assumed it was for batteries

        I wish they’d throw more money at cold fusion too. Just need Palladium for that one 😅

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Even if it was for batteries, unless we get fusion factors down to something that can fit in a car, power drill, smartphone, etc. batteries are still going to be a big part of the equation.

          Sure, you can generate enough juice to power whatever you want, but only as long as it’s plugged in, anything that needs to get detached from the grid is still going to need batteries, and you probably don’t want your car hooked up to a 10 mile long power cord for your commute.

    • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      ITER will not be having the first full fusion before 2040. And that’s just a prototype for science, it will not be a fusion power plant for generating energy for the public grid. So: fusion is still not very near.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wish this canard that fusion is right around the corner would die, we’re nowhere near. Where are people like OP getting their information from?