• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean is it really a truck?

    There needs to be a way to validate if something is a truck.

    Like, if you can’t put a 2x4 in it, is it a truck? Is an el camino a truck?

    IF a cybertruck is a truck, is a Pontiac Aztek a truck?

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        iirc, that is bc your Forester is an SUV that uses a truck chassis underneath, whereas the otherwise extremely similar Crosstrek uses the Impreza chassis so is more of a high “car”. But that could change over the years and I’m not really a car person so don’t quote me or anything!:-P

        • commandar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          His Forrester is built on a Legacy chassis; it’s a four door sedan with a little lift and a bigger body shell on top.

          • OpenStars@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Thanks for the correction. I see now, it’s a larger car chassis - so as @[email protected] said, that’s not a “truck”, light or otherwise, at all!?

            I did a search and found this article suggesting that it is a historical (hehe, some might say… “legacy”, eh?:-P) naming scheme, based on fuel economy:

            The U.S. government uses light-duty trucking as a vehicle class for the regulation of fuel economy by enforcing the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. The light-duty truck class includes pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), vans, and minivans.

            Since light-duty trucks are typically used for utility purposes rather than personal use, they have lower standards for fuel economy than cars do.

            • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              nope, not a truck in any sense of the word. granted I use it like one, lol, but it is very much a light passenger car chassis.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hey a 1961 Ford was my first vehicle. I did a lot of truck things with that. It was even one of one built of the crappy falcon body, which was one of Ford’s first unibodies. Boy did that thing flex.

      I even parked next to 2005ish Ford F150, with that dumb extra short bed. My 50 year old caruck has a bigger bed on it.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There needs to be a way to validate if something is a truck.

      Isn’t there already legal definitions such as gross vehicle weight? I know there have been some edge cases where people argue cars as trucks to get special truck access for commercial use. Chevy HHR comes to mind with some contractors.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, the el Camino caught a lot of flak when I was young. I remember my “surfer/ stoner/ slacker/ loser” gen x cousin who was a pool guy used his as a work vehicle and I guarantee that guy was SMASHING with that ride. I’m not saying a cyber truck truck is on that level and but some things take time to catch on.