GM confirms $130,000 Cadillac Escalade IQ won’t have Apple CarPlay or Android Auto | GM said it was going to drop Apple CarPlay and Android Auto in all vehicles, and now, that includes Cadillac’s l…::Cadillac confirms its new Google built-in infotainment leaves no room for Apple CarPlay or Android Auto. Instead, Google built-in is running the 55-inch infotainment screen.

  • TempleSquare@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ladies and gentlemen… FROM the company that brought us “Cadillac CUE” (all-capacitive-buttons information controls)…

    …Something nobody wants!

    • Nate@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I worked at a Cadillac dealership and I absolutely HATED the cars that had these. Barely functioned in the winter time

      • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Had that in my '17 CTS, the screen did it’s normal “I’m in control now” thing of random touch inputs until I finally had enough. Bought an aftermarket screen without the gel layer and replaced it, it was much better than OEM.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I still don’t understand why car brands don’t just use Android Automotive anyway. Most native infotainment systems in cars still look and feel like they’re from the early 2000s.

    That 55-inch interface they’re showing off really looks like some weird 2006-ish concept.

    Edit: Apparently, it’s running “Google built-in” which means that this particular system is based on Android Automotive OS and it’s just running some proprietary launcher on top.

      • AttackPanda@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We all know that the look of the interface will stay the same throughout the lifetime of the car. At least with CarPlay or Android Auto, it represents the interface of your phone. CarPlay is a hard requirement for my vehicles.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Y’know what would be great?

    An industry standard system that would work properly with any type of phone, tablet or other mobile device.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Preferably one that doesn’t run like shit.

      And while we’re at it, require physical nobs/buttons for basic navigation/climate control for safety purposes.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And while we’re at it, require physical nobs/buttons for basic navigation/climate control for safety purposes.

        AbsoFuckingLutely

  • Carter@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lack of AA isn’t the problem, it’s the 130k for that hideous monstrosity.

  • BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Call me crazy, but the way the bottom control screen is off centered from the central nav/infotainment bit above it looks horrible and I can’t imagine buying such an expensive car with such an annoying design.

  • ante@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not the target audience for this to begin with, but I refuse to own a car ever again that doesn’t have Android Auto. What a bunch of anti-consumer bullshit. What are the odds GM starts charging a subscription fee to access apps on these vehicles?

  • couragethebravedog@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone actually use either of those though? It’s always been more easy and convenient for me to just use my own phone.

          • FancyFeaster@lemmy.fail
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Typing in maps addresses that are too complex for the voice recognition to understand.

            You should still be able to do that on the car touchscreen just like the old Tom Tom etc…

            They also forget that sometimes there is a passenger wanting to do this, it’s not always just the driver in the car.

            • ante@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If there’s a passenger, at least in my car, the system recognizes it and let’s one type with the touchscreen.

          • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Listening to YouTube, playing music from my sd card. Changing routing instructions. Adding stops along the way. Avoiding highways, allowing highways. Asking what the exchange rate between the euro abd the dollar is. Asking if European chickens are smaller than American chickens. (And probably other things)

  • Lilnino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure a lot of you are reading that they are replacing ACP and AA with built in Google apps, including Google maps for navigation; they aren’t eliminating the functionality, they are replacing it.

    I think I would prefer this over slaving my phone to the car because there are some real annoying things about AA when I try to use it while connected to my car. The only big question is: do they require separate Internet connection or can I use my unlimited data plan phone as a hotspot. Having to pay for more connection services would piss me off, however I read somewhere a few weeks back that connecting to the Internet via a hotspot was supported.

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would happily keep slaving my phone to my car to avoid paying for extra services.

    • ante@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have wireless AA on my Civic and I literally get in the car, turn it on, and my phone connects automatically. It’s very convenient. What issues have you run into?

      • Lilnino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, unfortunately I don’t have wireless AA, so the cable can sometimes be an issue. Beyond that, they aren’t huge issues, but if I need to look something up in maps it won’t let me. I know, I’m not supposed to use while driving, but if I’m at a light and I want to do a quick detour search I can’t use the handheld (dash interface isn’t as easy to use as handheld). The contact search\phone app doesn’t work as easily for me and I find the voice search to be spotty.

        Like I said not big issues, but mostly just preference; I’d rather have my phone separate and free from restriction as I only use the maps through AA. My phone calls and audiobooks\podcasts we’re always fine through Bluetooth.