• XIIIesq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A man working an average job used to earn enough to buy an average house and comfortably support his wife and kids.

    Now you need two people in full-time work just to pay rent to the landlord.

    The problem is inequality of wealth and the solution is make work pay.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No no, you’re wrong. The problem is taxes are too high and the people on the absolute top don’t get enough money. If we just make them a bit richer, the wealth will finally start trickling down on us.

      Wait! I think I feel it trickling down right now!

      Nope. Just piss. Again.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        And too many immigrants. Surely if we keep them out, all those low wage manual labor jobs will still get done, and our population will increase

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The problem is that we aren’t sending enough money to the wealthy … we need to send them more money because they haven’t been able to trickle some back to us.

        /s sarcasm, this is sarcasm if anyone is wondering

        • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yacht tax deductions were a good start! Now we need coal and gas subsidies. Those poor capitalists haven’t had new subsidies in over 4 years!

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lol. How much does it cost to have a child in the hospital in the USA again? Oh, $18,865 you say? Huh. What if they need an ambulance to get there? Oh, $500 to $3000 depending on distance you say? And you say also that US Bureau of Labor and Statistics is letting us know that in four short years our grocery prices have risen 22.04% and are expected to rise another 5.11% per year indefinitely? Meanwhile corporate profits increase every single year and minimum wage has been stagnant for decades? Someone should get them quick!!! I think I figured out why no one wants to have babies anymore! I would like to also comment on how obscenely expensive daycare is and how fucked up it is we have to put children in school 40 hours a week just so we can keep working more than half our lives away but I feel like anyone reading this gets the idea. They will be begging your ass to have babies in the next 100 to 200 years if we make it that long and I’ll bet you all those obscene expenses will be an even greater cost to income ratio then, too. I mean if birthrates are a problem you have to ask yourself are they just fucking stupid or just fucking greedy?

    • figjam@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The future is bleak. The least I can do is not create another person to inflict it on.

    • sirboozebum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      While the cost of children, lack of support and stagnant wages are definately a factor, birth rates have declined even in countries where income inequality is lower and support for parents is higher.

      It is not going to be an easy problem to solve.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For us and everyone we know it was under $200. I’m not saying that everyone is going to have our levels of insurance but you are greatly exaggerating.

      The biggest cost by far is childcare hands down.

      Edit: I know I know, a $2500 median out of pocket expense hurts everyone’s head cannon.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    you want more kids make houses affordable and give people time off from work.

    If you want to further subjugate women so rich people can get away with more creepy sex crimes then you do what the GOP is currently doing.

  • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d love to have kids. I think it would be wonderful to be able to be a foster parent as another option.

    I can’t afford it. Its impossible. We can barely afford living as it is. How the fuck am I supposed to raise a kid?

    I’m shrugging at falling birth rates not out of indifference, but out of a lack of ability to do anything about it.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Hope? Things could improve, or at least hope that the next generation will be able to improve things. At the very least I see movement to try to do something about housing and college expenses. Maybe they’ll succeed. Renewable energy and electrification seem to be coming, regardless of active resistance. Too slow and too late, but maybe they’ll succeed. We’re in the middle of a wave of enthusiasm about high speed rail. Maybe they’ll succeed

  • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    I keep hearing stories about falling birth rates, USA, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and on and on.
    The articles often pose many questions about why younger generations dont seem to care about having kids, but very few articles actually say the real reasons:

    • Being able to afford a house or stable long term rent without either option competing for money to buy food or other essentials
    • Further to this the cost of a child once you can get by with enough money for the above
    • Climate change & future conditions for their children anxiety
    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The first one is the main reason we could afford to have kids.

      We were able to buy our first house because of three things. First the housing market crash in 2008-9. My wife’s car was totaled by a rich bitch in a Mercedes. Our rented duplex was robbed and we had renters insurance. The combination of insurance payments and cheaper prices allowed us to purchase our first home.

      My house payment hasn’t changed since 2009. It made up 36% of our take-home income then. Today it makes up less than 11%. I pay less per month than it costs to rent a 1 bedroom apartment in my area.

      The older I get the more I see that landlords are a parasite on society. They extract generate huge amounts of wealth from the suffering of others.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The real reason is more educated people worry to much, and less educated people just go for it.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also, wouldn’t increasing the population cause more inflation. Like if you look at Japans decline in Japanese born citizens it overlaps with the “lost years” of economic growth, which was a surprisingly stable period where depreciation ruled the economy… Prices for every day items were stable for decades on end.

  • Aidinthel@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If politicians want people to have more children, maybe they could do something to make having kids less ruinously-expensive.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only reason economists say immigration can offset falling birthrate. Is because the system is designed for low wages to keep the system running

  • azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a species we have the tools, technology, education, knowledge, cognition, and intelligence to override an animal instinct to reproduce willy nilly. We’re more than that now. People should know what it means to choose to have children and weigh the benefits vs the costs to their lives.

    Have children when you want to and when it makes sense. If it doesn’t make sense, then don’t do it. Humanity will survive thinning down to many billions fewer humans sitting around consuming resources. A person who never existed in the first place because healthy adults decided to put their time and resources into something else shouldn’t be lamented, but a choice respected.

    My family has a long history of not having many children. Our family tree is one of marrying in people and then just not growing larger generation to generation. We have plenty of childless couples in the tree and they make the coolest aunts and uncles a kid can have.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Clearly your family has a long history of enough children since you’re here to talk about it.

      I feel like the opposite. My grandfather was one of 13, my mom was one of six, I was one of four, but the next generation only has my two. So far the odds of one more generation are not looking good.

      Sure, the world is overpopulated but that’s a short term problem. Every estimate has a peak within 50 years, then a drop. It would be better for us all if that drop were a slow decline to something more sustainable rather than steep, chaotic, disruptive, if the slow drop were uniform, rather than much steeper for some

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Theme to lean into: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement

    Get all your right wing nutcase friends to have more babies “for the cause”, then get all your left wing nutcase friends to have more babies because “oh noes, Project 2025”. Pretty soon your social security will be funded and you can retire in peace, far from either

    • brlemworld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or instead of overpopulating we can increase immigration to fund social security without having to wait multiple decades.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You don’t want to pay ever increasing prices on one of the most expensive undertakings a person (or couple) can do… An undertaking which may also act to increase inflation its self!?