Anadolu Agency – Bias and Credibility

Overall, we rate Anadolu Agency Right Biased editorially and Mixed factually due to poor sourcing. Further, this is an agency controlled by the right-wing ruling party and has a very strong pro-government state bias.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: RIGHT Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: Turkey MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: LIMITED FREEDOM Media Type: News Agency Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

This is probably an unrelated app.

This is great! How does this system handle security/privacy concerns?

Google automatically blurs faces and license plates, and there are vulnerable and secure locations that are blurred by request, for example.

I would hate to see something like this misused by law enforcement or by violent radicals.

Care to share an explanation or link about what panoramix is?

This reminds me of that movie Tusk.

Don’t watch Tusk.

Okay, now we’re cooking!

This is like when the bad guy from the last movie teams up with the heroes at the last minute to help fight the new big bad.

There

Has

Got

To

Be

A

Way

Burning down the house

At least now you know who to blame

Gross.

TBF to the sister in Christ, someone is taking the Giants down.

So his usual spaghetti strategy - throw out every crazy idea and see what sticks. If the base doesn’t like it then it was just a joke or misunderstanding - surely you didn’t think it was serious, did you?

Well… Good for them. Am I supposed to be alarmed by this? Weren’t we saying a decade ago how China was the top contributor to pollution? Now they are doing something about it by investing in necessary tech?

If US and EU can’t compete due to subsidies, let’s increase our subsidies. C’mon, it’s not rocket surgery.

Aren’t cicadas already sex-crazed?

Thank you for adding. These details were not available at the time of posting.

The point is not that the church is evil. The point is that it’s wrong and unAmerican even if the church is everything it claims to be.

Your church can be all about helping others, making a more equitable world, non-judgement, providing community services, teaching good ethics, etc. (what are you, pastafarian?), but it still does not belong in the public schools. Sorry not sorry to Christians and Pastafarians.

Not quite so cut and dry, but yeah. This is a likely possibility for what is meant by “the 10 commandments.”

I don’t think they would be dwarf planets, but something else.

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) defined in August 2006 that, in the Solar System, a planet is a celestial body that:

1 is in orbit around the Sun, 2 has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape), and 3 has “cleared the neighbourhood” around its orbit.

A dwarf planet must meet 1 & 2. Are Jupiter’s smaller moons round?

Jupiter has rings, so any planet would have to have cleared the rings around their orbit. I think that applies to the Galilean moons. Juno orbits outside the solar plane, so I’m not sure if that is a rule for a planet or not.

No cream for me please.

I don’t know that the History Channel is a good representation of academic consensus. It should basically never be relied upon.

That’s prehistory. Everything we know about history comes from written accounts. Historians study written documents and argue whether or not the available evidence makes it more likely that something (or someone) was real or fiction.

Most historians agree that there was a Jewish man named Jesus (yehoshua), who preached in Judea and the Galilee in the early first century, who gained followers and was crucified by Rome. There are also historians who examine the same evidence and conclude it is more likely that no such person existed, because that’s how academia works.

See also for comparison: Genghis Khan