• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nobody panic!

      The only people that matter, who also happen to be the ones that caused and continue to exacerbate the climate apocalypse knowingly for private profit, have built luxury bunker complexes in temperate places like New Zealand to shield themselves from the consequences of their own actions.

      No one important is in danger, just us billions of disposable capital batteries, no biggie.

      Now get back to work! The owners/Pharoahs/oligarchs/beloved job creators have quarterly ego score expectations to exploit out of you before you die of heat stroke as a result of your bad decisions, like being poor!

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        In 1988 my uncle was working as a chemist for the oil industry in Oman. When he was home he’d tell us about global warming from carbon dioxide from burning oil

        In the industry they knew. In politics they knew. But it made a lot of money and they’d be dead before New York would be flooded

        I wish aging had been solved back then, so those people would know they’d live to see the impending disaster

        RIP Great Barrier Reef this coming southern summer

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          New York won’t get flooded for another 100-200 years… we may still need to solve the aging problem if we want to avoid that.

        • queermunist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is literally idealism.

          You have an idea about a market solution to the problem, and then act like you’ve solved the problem.

          The problem isn’t a lack of ideas! The problem is a lack of implementation! You have to get these ideas into the real world somehow, and revolution is the only way you can do that. There are billionaires aligned against implementing these ideas. You have to stop them.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not idealism. If you have a better solution that is not radical by design, go ahead. I was literally not specific intentionally. Go ahead, what instrument within the current system would work that are not regulations?

            • queermunist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Regulations don’t work when they don’t get implemented, which means your ideas are purely ideas and not materialistic solutions. There aren’t going to be any regulations, don’t you get it? That ship has so obviously sailed.

              There isn’t a better solution that’s not radical and that’s why radical solutions all that’s left!

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hottest 36 days on record. Also the coolest summer we can expect to see for the rest of our lives.

      • gornar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        People generally don’t realize this, but it’ll become apparent soon enough!

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, if I were an alien looking down at us little billions of ants destroying their own habitat to construct tributes to a few thousand fat ants, to the point all the ants were about to die off, I’d be tilting my head and laughing my alien ass off.

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d be really sad, because I have empathy. Of course, maybe you’d be a psychopathic alien who laughs at injustice and pain.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    So that’s why all the conservatives are laughing and cheering. I was wondering why they were celebrating. They are accomplishing their mission of killing us all.

      • K3zi4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Them libs want to protest the climate issue? Well fuck em, let’s burn more oil and make more profit for those companies! That’ll show them snowflake protestors!”

        This is literally the mindset we’re up against. They’ve been brainwashed so hard into “owning libs”, and have their tongues so far up billionaire’s arseholes, they have lost any sense of empathy, sympathy, and basic intelligence. We’re all fucked.

        • Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Part of the problem with being socially minded is that your representatives tend to be less inclined to abuse their power to disingenuously manipulate useful idiots. We’d rather educate them than manipulate them, but they’re too stupid to know the difference.

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry, they’re gearing up for the “Climate change is real, but we just need to genocide more of the people with a <100kg/yr carbon footprint to fix it” chapter of dogshit rhetoric soon.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ll never say that in good faith because it’s the rich that have the biggest carbon footprints.

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          My point is they’ll (continue to) blame the people whose carbon footprints are <1% of theirs and would be manageable for centuries and advocate for genocide as a solution.

          Currently blaming the global south is just used to deflect.

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fun fact: All this probably happened because we stopped to geoengineer by outlawing ships blowing sulphur into the air which created additional cloud cover. That is, this year isn’t really exceptional climate-change wise, it’s just that we could witness, by fortuitous natural experiment, how much worse it actually already is… as well as that we can limit the impact by geoengineering. It works, and without wrecking havoc on the overall system.

    And the good news is that we don’t need to blow sulphur into the air to generate clouds, the same effect can be had by blowing salt water into the air, just strap a couple of water cannons to every cargo ship. No I’m dead serious.

    • doomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All this probably happened because we stopped to geoengineer by outlawing ships blowing sulphur into the air which created additional cloud cover.

      You have your causality running backwards… this was already here, and the sulfur was masking it. This happened because we put so many GHG in the air.

      It works, and without wrecking havoc on the overall system.

      Europe is the one that initiated the sulfur reductions. With the additional dimming data now available, they reviewed it to determine how much damage had been caused. The conclusion? The benefits of reducing sulfur actually outweigh the damage of unmasked warming. The plan for further reductions was upheld.

      If we mask radiative forcing, we don’t want to be doing it with sulfur. That leads to acid rain, ocean acidification, and asthma and other diseases. CaCO3 is a candidate. The long-term consequences of any candidate is unknown. Except that we know that the less sulfur raining down on us and the fish in general, the better.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have your causality running backwards… this was already here, and the sulfur was masking it.

        Which is what I said?

        • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was probably framing it like

          Fun fact: All this probably happened because we stopped to geoengineer by outlawing ships blowing sulphur into the air which created additional cloud cover.

          Instead of something like “we noticed the effects of climate change exceptionally this year because we stopped blowing sulphur (…)”. Yes, this is probably pedantic in a room where everyone understands anthropocentric climate change. Still, I can understand why some people might want to be extremely clear with how we use language regarding this topic, given… Everything that’s going on.

  • bentropy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is totally terrifying but also very strange to read about the record heat everywhere while we here in Germany had probably the coldest July in a decade. We had 16C where we should have had 30C. And we had rain, a lot of rain.

    Still, I’m terrified.

  • Alex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the Fossil Fuel Industry Doesn’t Want You To Know | Al Gore | TED https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgZC6da4mco

    Oil barrons merely see global warming as yet another catastrophe to take advantage of for power and profit, they will have their companies pump oil til there’s not a single drop left to pump anywhere, using every excuse they can find to keep pumping and polluting while evading taxes and regulation as much as possible. They are evil scum and belong in jail for their lies and behavior.

  • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Phoenix just broke its record for consecutive days over 110° at 31, previous record was half that…

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cincinnati only had two days over 90 total all summer so far. I think we may get another day this week. Phoenix is getting all of our heat.

  • potopato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    43 ºC in my town today. Now we are at 32 ºC and is 23:00.

    This is hell.

  • jeanma@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Couldn’t the massive fires (energy and compounds generated) exacerbate these values?

    Don’t make me say what I didn’t say.

    • danny@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      No actually fires have an overall negative (lowering) effect on temperatures, because the smoke reduces the sun energy from reaching land over large areas, it’s been well established that areas affected by smoke will have lower peak temps than they otherwise would have. Except it can cause temps to stay higher overnight by preventing the heat from escaping into atmosphere.

      But in terms of highest temps ever recorded… it doesn’t seem fires would contribute to that at all, more just a consequence of the high temps (drying effect).

      • jeanma@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you, but I was talking about heat generated by the fires and compound build-up (eg: co2), while the last one might bring its effects later.

        Just to be sure, I talk about these figures, not the global climate deregulation.