silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agoShould Climate Protesters Be Less Annoying?newrepublic.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down116file-text
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkShould Climate Protesters Be Less Annoying?newrepublic.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLoom In Essence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWhen you vaguely tell somebody to read more it’s because you have no actual argument. There is no connection to environmental issues. They are doing this to look cool to their friends.
minus-squareex_06@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWell, if you want a suggestion: “Neither Vertical Nor Horizontal” by Rodrigo Nunes I’m just tired of repeating the same stuff all over the web, I also wrote an article in Italian about it 😄
minus-squareAesthesiaphilia@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoIf you can’t summarize your point, don’t even bring it up.
minus-squareex_06@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI can, I don’t want to do it cause inevitably it would open up to questions that in a non summary would be already answered. If you want to know more about complex topics don’t expect to learn them by reading hot takes on the internet.
minus-squareAesthesiaphilia@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoIf your entire thesis can be summarized by “hot take” then that tells me everything I need to know.
minus-squareHardlightCereal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThey are doing it because it gets people talking and thinking about climate collapse, and that leads to solutions.
minus-squareLoom In Essence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoNo, it gets people talking about people who glue themselves to paintings. And that’s as far as the conversation goes because it has no connection whatsoever to environmental issues. It’s pure uncut narcissism.
minus-squareHardlightCereal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoHey, no slurs.
minus-squareLoom In Essence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI didn’t use a slur. Come back when you have something to contribute.
minus-squareMechoselachia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoThis has nothing to do with mental illness, don’t use that word like that
minus-squareLoom In Essence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoCome back when you have something substantial to contribute.
When you vaguely tell somebody to read more it’s because you have no actual argument.
There is no connection to environmental issues. They are doing this to look cool to their friends.
Well, if you want a suggestion: “Neither Vertical Nor Horizontal” by Rodrigo Nunes
I’m just tired of repeating the same stuff all over the web, I also wrote an article in Italian about it 😄
If you can’t summarize your point, don’t even bring it up.
I can, I don’t want to do it cause inevitably it would open up to questions that in a non summary would be already answered.
If you want to know more about complex topics don’t expect to learn them by reading hot takes on the internet.
If your entire thesis can be summarized by “hot take” then that tells me everything I need to know.
They are doing it because it gets people talking and thinking about climate collapse, and that leads to solutions.
No, it gets people talking about people who glue themselves to paintings. And that’s as far as the conversation goes because it has no connection whatsoever to environmental issues. It’s pure uncut narcissism.
Hey, no slurs.
I didn’t use a slur. Come back when you have something to contribute.
This has nothing to do with mental illness, don’t use that word like that
Come back when you have something substantial to contribute.