I really need to get in contact with some people on WA and have some groups to join and have been waiting for interoperability to get going so I don’t have to use zuck’s app . But the said date march has long passed and I can’t find shit on it or why it didn’t happen anywhere . I have yesterday downloaded the apk from WA’s official site and is in half a heart to install it . I know everything I say there should be considered public but besides that and the app knowing my IP and contacts is there any hidden data collection I should be aware of ? Or should I wait some more which I don’t think I can as am loosing patience lol . Also will it even be global or support apps that are really privacy focused unlike the usual suspects like TG or signal ?

Edit : Seems like I have to suck up to Meta as our lizard lord intended . As WhatsApp is ad free (to my knowledge) it is all but confirmed they are selling data . In my opinion Meta is more evil than google as google is at least taking some hits and hosting things on lose that we can access without making them a dime (newpipe -youtube, google search engine - unlock with firefox) and they fund Firefox and maintain AOSP, meanwhile all meta do is making their service a thing which we can’t leave and steal fuckin everything they do absolutely no good whatsoever and have no redeeming qualities and people or laws don’t give them enough shit for it . People may say “if you don’t like meta just don’t use it” well guess what we can’t stop it as almost everything needs their platforms nowadays . Sorry that turned into a rant figured .

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    29 days ago

    Groups are not (yet) supported by the proposed interoperability anyways… and don’t hold your breath. It will likely take years for Meta and the EU in courts before they stop with their malicious compliance.

    There are working WA bridges for XMPP and Matrix though if you are willing to selfhost.

    • Psych@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      But matrix one still needs me to make an WhatsApp acc and run the app on a device no ? I don’t see much point then to go through that amount of work. Idk how XMPP does it, is it similar ?

      Also interoperability between XMPP/Matrix and WB would be dope if it ever happens .

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Both bridges require you to log into WA with the official app once every 4 weeks or so. You can put the app in a seperate profile and completely kill its process during this time or have an old device somewhere in a closet that you power on now and then. This is possible now since WA improved their multi-client support (maybe 1 year ago or so?).

        That said, don’t expect anything other than basic text chat to work via these bridges.

        • roflo1@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          I have an old device in the closet and use the matrix bridge. The bridge bot kindly reminds me to turn on the phone every 12 days, but I think WA’s requirement is 15 days.

          I do have to ask though: other than basic text chat, what else does WA offer these days?

          For the record, I’m able to see videos, images and listen to audio. Haven’t received a poll yet. Is there anything more to it?

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            Not impossible, but without a camera to scan the QR code it becomes quite annoying.

            • Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              you can probably set the virtual camera to an image i think, i cant remember, it’s been a while since I messed with Android Studio

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Consider the level privacy of an interoperable / federated network is only as good as the node with the lowest level of privacy. The moment you connect to Meta infra, you’re feeding it data, including but not limited to who you talked with, when you online, your message frequency, and possibly a whole lot more. Then they can start linking other bits to form a complete profile of you.

    It is just slightly better than installing WA., and also part of tge reasons why many Mastodon and Lemmy server refuse to federate with Meta Threads.

  • grid11@lemy.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    29 days ago

    Mar 25, 2024 —

    … the Commission has granted Meta an extension of 6 months to comply with the interoperability obligation (Article 7 DMA)

    Because of a “reasoned request” [from META]. … Commission said it’s received and accepted [request] from Meta.

    granted because it was:

    “necessary to ensure effective interoperability and to maintain the necessary level of security, including end-to-end encryption”.

    and after that, there will be another request and so on forever, they have alot of dough to burn.

    more details

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Use matrix and bridges. Tchncs.de has a whatsapp bridge for free I think. Please consider donating because running this stuff is expensive. There are others as well but tchncs is the only one I know. I run bridges for myself and friends but they also chip in.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      What’s the point of this? You still have a Meta account, they still have your phone #, and they still collect all the metadata from said account.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Many reasons:

        1. you can disable background updates, wifi and mobile data, location, etc. which renders the app useless. They cant collect directly from the phone that way.
        2. I have one app for all my messaging needs. No need to switch
        3. i will always ask for matrix communication first which takes meta out of the loop
        4. i have friends who arent tech savvy or ready to switch so I am not forced to use whatsapp
        5. its a fun exercise and I provide feedback for the makers of the bridges which helps development
        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          you can disable background updates, wifi and mobile data, location, etc. which renders the app useless. They cant collect directly from the phone that way.

          …why not just uninstall the app altogether at that point?

          Most privacy concerns don’t stem from any of that anyway, it stems from the metadata in your messages. Who you’re talking to, when, how often, etc.

          I have one app for all my messaging needs.

          I mean I guess that’s true if you only use 2 messaging platforms?

          i will always ask for matrix communication first which takes meta out of the loop

          You can do that without bridges.

          i have friends who arent tech savvy or ready to switch so I am not forced to use whatsapp

          …but you are using WhatsApp. It’s not just an app, it’s a service.

          its a fun exercise

          If this is what you find fun, more power to you. Just don’t be under the illusion that this increases privacy even a little.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            29 days ago

            I’m somewhat appreciative of the neutral tone you use in your comment but I’m kind of taken aback by the fact that you seem to think i wanted an answer to the points I made. I find it very rude to try and take apart someones reasoning which was given in good faith. If I wanted your opinion on that, I would have asked.

            I can see that it is not what you would do and I you dont seem to understand my reasons for doing what I do. I dont mind that. What I do mind is unsolicited critique or advice.

            Have a good day.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              I wasn’t trying to “take apart your reasoning”. You are under false impressions, and spreading false impressions to others.

              • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                29 days ago

                It’s great that you can form your own opinions. You should really refrain from pushing your opinions on others though.

                Good bye.

                • user@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  28 days ago

                  Firstly, they did not push anything on you. And this is the internet and a discussion focused site at that. You should either accept that people can reply to you without you granting them the right to do so, or reconsider participating within public discourse, for your own wellbeing.

    • Psych@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      They won’t lol everything is too integrated for anyone to switch and no one except me gives a fuck about privacy in my friends circle and family .

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Interoperability with what?

    It’s not going to matter, as far as privacy is concerned. Meta is going to collect your metadata regardless of whether you use WhatsApp or any other theoretically interoperable platform.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Are you in Europe? I haven’t downloaded WhatsApp but it was supposed to get a “third party tab” or something. No idea what happened with that.

    Also I made the switch to Signal years ago and told my friends: either you switch or we use email. Everybody hates email, so the good friends installed signal. Acquaintances didn’t and they stayed acquaintances.

    Now I also made more friends who care about privacy (or me) enough to install signal.

    It’s kinda up to you, which guns you stick to.

    P.S Fuck Facebook. I hope the EU fines them for hampering interoperability.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I hope the EU fines them for hampering interoperability.

      This depends on there being enough greens and liberals in the European Parliament.

      PSA: EU citizens, you may still have an hour or so to go out and VOTE. It matters.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        European citizens laughed when Trump won, but the ridicule turned into laziness. “It can’t happen here, there’s no need to vote”.

        I bet we’ll have a right wing parliament and council, but as the Germans say " hope dies last".

        Anti Commercial-AI license