misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agoMeta releases Threads API for developers to build “unique integrations”www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkMeta releases Threads API for developers to build “unique integrations”www.theverge.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaredanhab99@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 days agoIsn’t threads.net activitypub?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·15 days agoIt’s unidirectional and opt-in
minus-squareAdanisi@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 days agoSupposedly. Supposedly they also weren’t going to ignore the standard and do their own thing but I guess this disproves that.
minus-squareKayn@dormi.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·15 days agoLemmy has its own API. Does this prove their ignorance of the standard too?
minus-squaremisk@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agoHaving own client API doesn’t affect ActivityPub compatibility.
Isn’t threads.net activitypub?
It’s unidirectional and opt-in
Supposedly. Supposedly they also weren’t going to ignore the standard and do their own thing but I guess this disproves that.
Lemmy has its own API. Does this prove their ignorance of the standard too?
Having own client API doesn’t affect ActivityPub compatibility.