• NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Marx postulates that history moves through a continuous fight between classes, and that on average we move towards a more equal society over time as a result of this fight

    We’ve been backsliding heavily since the 50s. I mean, things might be better than the industrial revolution but wealth inequality is even worse.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t need to be a unidirectional process - things get worse, the proletariat revolts, and they get better. Then things get worse again, and they revolt again. Eventually we reach a stable point where things are good enough for the proletariat to stop revolting - and that would be the communist society.

      That said, while I largely subscribe to a Marxist understanding of history, I don’t personally find historical determinism very convincing. Marx’ theory might even have been a self-defeating prophesy, as it taught the ruling classes the mechanisms of history it needed to defeat in order to stay in power. The American right wing might not be fans of Marx, but they for sure ripped a page from his book to understand the importance of union busting.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d argue the internet was a major opportunity towards distributed knowledge and coordinated social action.

      But that peaked in the early 2000s and the tide has been receeding ever since.

      The latest developments indicate more and more corporate enshitification is coming.