• elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not Latino, but I feel like that would annoy me. Latin@ as well. The language is gendered, trying to eliminate that is absurd.

    • SomeoneElseMod@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never understood LatinX. Is it supposed to be a gender neural Latino/Latina? I’m only a Spanish beginner but I’m fairly sure Latino can be masculine and gender neutral.

      • tuto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        brezhoneg
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “LatinX” was indeed the first attempt at a gender neutral description. “Latino” is still considered by many native speakers to be “neutral”, but the most feasible solution I’ve seen popping up is the “latine” (as in “estudiante”, “vigilante”, etc). Since it uses an explicitly non-gendered suffix, it is more correctly inclusive than the “latino”. It will take a while though, und until it is really widely adopted.

        • DudePluto@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Latino” is still considered by many native speakers to be “neutral”

          So like, is there any sizeable Latin community actually calling for a gender neutral term or is this just a middle-class white people thing? Because as a white person I’ve never seen anyone push for this other than white people and it just seems like a white savior/ daddy knows best thing. But my experience is just my experience

          • CreativeShotgun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am trans and Latina and it is totally a thing. We have queer people too, we come in all the normal colors and a few weird ones too.