The first world that humans should inhabit beyond the Earth is the Moon, not Mars. Here’s how to terraform our lunar neighbor.

  • Maestro@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Terraforming the moon isn’t possible. There is no atmosphere. The article is using the term terraforming wrong. It specifically means changing an entire planet. Building a base with a greenhouse isn’t terraforming.

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both places are incredibly hostile to humans and will require a massive amount of resources to change that.

    Both have their advantages and disadvantages.

    Saying one is better than the other and implying that terraforming either of them will be anything but a centuries long process is click-bate nonsense.

  • OutOfMemory@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Easier to live on? Definitely. Easier to terraform? No way. The moon is too small to hold onto an atmosphere, so humans would forever be bubble bound on the moon. Mars has tons of problems, but terraforming is possible at least.

    • BoobiesUnite@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      not to mention the fact that their bodies would get totally messed up. imagine a kid raised on the moon from birth - their bones would be super weak and there is no way they could come to earth.

      Do we even know what would happen to your spine if you grew up there?

      • tree1000@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could also be an issue on Mars. The TV series The Expanse is pretty realistic scifi in general, and Martians need to be top athletic soldiers to be able to endure Earth’s gravity in it

  • Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Moon regolith is pretty nasty stuff. It’s chemically reduced due to the lack of O2 to react with, and becomes corrosive when exposed to moisture. The absence of atmosphere, means that sharp edges of the dust particles aren’t rounded off by erosion, making the dust/soil particularly abrasive. It’s also positively charged, so sticks to everything.

    None of that is insurmountable, but it does stack up mitigation costs.