• PlantJam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    How is crypto not a valid use? Crypto as a get rich quick scheme is stupid and useless, but crypto for peer to peer payments is perfectly valid.

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not suggesting that crypto replace any existing use for bank cards or apps like zelle or cash app. I’m suggesting that there are other payment scenarios where excusing systems don’t fit, like a dispensary that lost access to a payment processor (hypothetical, not sure if this has happened) or a merchant wanting to avoid transaction fees. It’s absolutely useless in 99% of all transactions, but it’s not 100%.

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you arguing that any technology that does the same thing as an existing one has zero value whatsoever?

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If I had to spitball an answer, I’d say the value of an innovation increases as it improves on existing similar things, and decreases as it worsens from them.

          I don’t see any benefit to crypto for sending money, and introducing a new, volatile currency backed by people’s imagination is a detraction to me.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh yeah I love paying someone using a wildly volatile currency that goes up and down like a roller coaster and has exorbitant transaction fees. But at least I’m not a chump who uses a bank card.