Reddit says Microsoft’s Bing, Anthropic, and Perplexity have scraped its data without permission. “It has been a real pain in the ass to block these companies.”

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    341
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    "Without these agreements, we don’t have any say or knowledge of how our data is displayed and what it’s used for, which has put us in a position now of blocking folks who haven’t been willing to come to terms with how we’d like our data to be used or not used,” Huffman said in an interview this week

    It’s not your data.

    Fuck off.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 month ago

      My only regret was not deleting all my comments before deleting my reddit account :P

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t regret too much. I wouldn’t be surprised if reddit’s “delete” function was really just "move to the “suckers-wanted-to-delete-this” file.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I “deleted” all my posts, then randomly had someone reply to a 3 year old post that wasn’t showing up in my profile but still showed on the page.

          Don’t delete your comments, edit them to be useless.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Probably, but when someone is going through old posts they are going to see the edit, not the history. The main goal here is to make Reddit less useful so people go elsewhere. Let Google’s AI be trained on Bot posts.

            • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Good news, Reddit’s crap ass infra doesn’t differentiate if a GDPR request is legitimate or spurious. Or at least it didn’t back when I processed mine, they may have closed that loophole

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Same, plus or minus a year.

          It took me a week, but I scrambled every comment and post with lorem ipsum and bee movie scripts, deleted the comments, then after verifying I could no longer find any of my original content on any search engine outside archive sites, I deleted the account.

          It took so long because r*ddit started limiting API access when they realized people were automating their profile scrubbing.

          As I’ve said before about certain countries, if you’re doing everything you can to prevent people from leaving [THING/PLACE] then you might just be shit.

          • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I was straight IP banned permanently for reporting the Israeli genocide fans and racists arguing for the eradication of Palestinians. I just deleted the account because I never imagined they would turn into such shitheels.

            • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I got IP banned for asking if there was any “good news” about Mitch McConnell after his strokes. I intentionally worded it ambiguously, but the mod on r/politics looked at my political history/not a conservative and decided I was celebrating violence and so I was IP banned. I guess only Mitch McConnell is allowed to salivate at violence openly and the rest of us are supposed to be worried for his health. It’s not a problem if women are the ones he’s directing violence towards, but God forbid a woman speak back to him. Pregnancy and birth cause strokes and clots, and that’s preferable to him vs an abortion… but God forbid he get strokes at the end of his life from being a horrible person and I find that preferable to his stupid harmful policies

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                The way they enforce that no violence rule is so fucking stupid. Even if you had said “I hope that stroke implodes his brain” you aren’t advocating violence. A medical issue isn’t violence.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              And here I got IP banned for saying we should murk the crown prince of Saudi Arabia. This was around the time the journalist got butchered in that Saudi Embassy. As an aside the Saudis have oil and are assholes how long till we start drone striking them?

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                As an aside the Saudis have oil and are assholes how long till we start drone striking them?

                They would either need to stop playing ball, or oil is no longer a staple for energy generation and transport needs.

                Until then, the 9/11 architects will be able to hang out and do whatever they want.

                Also, thanks for protecting your friends that day GW, here’s hoping you get “touched” by a friend from a long way away…

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Part of the ToS. Whatever you put on there is effectively theirs. Same with Facebook and your photos etc.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Whatever you put on there is effectively theirs.

        I would so love if companies that had decided they own/can sell the data users published lost section 230 protection. Oh, this is your data? I guess you don’t need to be protected against the data users post if it’s your data now.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        And whatever you put on a public accessible webpage is effectively anyone’s who makes a get request.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        No you cannot transfer copyright with ToS agreements just give license for reddit to use your copyright.

    • lmaydev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      82
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean it literally is. People post it there voluntarily knowing that. It’s what keeps the lights on.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Sort of, but not really. From the Reddit ToS (emphasis mine). Basically, you own your content but allow Reddit to use it however they want without crediting you. Only a corporate lawyer would call that arrangement “ownership”, but I digress…


        By submitting Your Content to the Services, you represent and warrant that you have all rights, power, and authority necessary to grant the rights to Your Content contained within these Terms. Because you alone are responsible for Your Content, you may expose yourself to liability if you post or share Content without all necessary rights.

        You retain any ownership rights you have in Your Content, but you grant Reddit the following license to use that Content:

        When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit. You also agree that we may remove metadata associated with Your Content, and you irrevocably waive any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to Your Content.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Beyond that, if you are serving webpages with data on them, you don’t get to decide what people do with those pages. They can’t stop search engines from scraping

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 month ago

            Just to nitpick, they can stop scraping, anyone can. However, doing so would require implementing barriers that tend to also negatively effect sites that are dependent on being discovered and browsed.

        • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s right there in the ToS: NON-EXCLUSIVE license. If they go to court, I would guess they lose.

        • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s actually a fascinating bind Steve/Reddit has put themselves in. Because it is a non-exclusive license, you can affirmatively declare your content is free for anyone to scrape or use.

          After that, if Reddit ever asserts rights over your content by, say, suing Microsoft for improperly using your content in training data, you now have a legal claim against Reddit for interference with either your ownership rights or with a contract via whatever license you have made your content available under.

          Now, maybe Reddit has a claim release in their TOS, but it wouldn’t prevent you from getting an injunction enjoining Reddit from restricting your data from being used by Microsoft.

          It’s kind of academic, because… it’s not really a victory that Microsoft is also training its AI on your data. But, hey, they’re probably doing it anyway and at least this way we get to screw over Huffman for being an ass.

          • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The only issue I see with this is that it can be argued that this license doesn’t grant third parties access to data on Reddit’s platform.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            MS couldn’t access that content without scraping the page itself, though, which of course belongs to Reddit. From a legal standpoint, it’s like a paywall.

        • chakan2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          Lol…really? So the can reuse, modify, and remove all association with your content, but somehow you think you still own it?

          I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            1 month ago

            In essence, it means that you reserve the right to also use the content for your own purposes, without Reddit having any recourse to preventing you from doing that.

            • chakan2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Except they published your work, all variants of said work, and completely eliminated you as the author of said work.

              I don’t know how else to explain to you that you don’t own that work anymore. You have rights to it. But you don’t own it.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It literally isn’t. Even their shitty EULA only claims a license to use it, not that it’s their data.

        And approximately 100% of the data on their servers was created while it was accessible to literally anyone who wanted it without restriction through a free API. Virtually none of the content was ever intended to be kept from fucking search engines so it could be sold for AI.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup keeps the lights on and makes sure Spez gets his yearly 200 million bonus. It’s good that they are tightening the screw because 200 million is clearly not enough, he deserves double that at least.

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are not responsible for what people post, nor do they pay anyone to post, therefore I do not see how they can claim the data as “theirs”.

        They have their own self-regualted rules, but ultimately most anything is fair game for reddit to point at the user and say “we take no responsibility for what an individual may post on this public form”.

        The only thing they will have a problem with is CSAM, but even then as long the volunteer mods remain effective at removing it, reddit will not be responsible for anything users post.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      When the internet was new I thought that the spread of knowleege would raise up people’s awareness of things they had not been exposed to under the false assumption that the vast majority of people where reasonable, but uninformed.

      Nope, I was wrong. At best a slight majority are reasonable with varying levels of ignorance and the rest are willfully ignorant.

      • Crismus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        In the early years, I learned a lot of new things. The late 90’s had so much hope for the web and learning new things. I remember falling I to rabbit holes a lot more often back then because it wasn’t about video essays and persuasive videos.

        I miss all of those old text based chatting and the friends I made on Yahoo local chat rooms. Somedays I wish the social media sites run by algorithms didn’t surpass those old forums and chat rooms.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Internet is just a new form of mass media to control the minds of people who aren’t paying attention

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t remember when it was starting out but I do remember the forums of the 00s as well as the overall online culture of the time. The fediverse is the closest I’ve gotten to feeling that again but obviously nothing will ever feel like that again because I’m an adult and all the sense of wonder is gone from the online world for me.

      At least here, we’re not on a platform owned by corporations.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I remember. Now it’s mostly walled gardens everywhere. Capitalism fucked us again.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Remember when you had RSS with HUNDREDS of different websites and had your own personal little newspaper every day 🥲

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I just started hearing about some Facebook at some point, and then some (it’s Russia) Odnoklassniki and Vkontakte and a few other spaces.

      These seemed to be the sites which lamers use to feel themselves relevant with that Internet thing. Leprosoria of the Web. Places where I wouldn’t go, even if I would sometimes go to porn sites, especially when depressed.

      Normal people would use LiveJournal and move from ICQ to XMPP and Skype. Skype voice calls (back then they were better with countryside radio link than now with GPON) were a miracle, so me and everybody around me moved to Skype.

      Then there was a moment when the Web suddenly died and everyone was on those social networks.

      I actually blame LJ and Skype. Technically these worked fine, but they were a gateway drug.

      LJ made it easy to have something like a personal webpage, only it wasn’t personal, it was in LJ. ICQ lost popularity when it fought alternative clients, there were no alternative clients for Skype at all and everybody got used to service providers dictating how people should use their service, imposing their client software.

      It’s still terrifying how that ICQ run was the last such run in modern Internet’s history. A company fucked around and found out. Nothing like that has happened since. That’s my canary.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Without these agreements, we don’t have any say or knowledge of how our data is displayed and what it’s used for, which has put us in a position now of blocking folks who haven’t been willing to come to terms with how we’d like our data to be used or not used

    It’s the users’ data, not yours, you rent seeking fuck

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Let’s see … how do we get more people to visit our site? I know! We’ll prevent search engines from sending people to it!”

    • Sordid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s phase three of the enshittification cycle. In phase one you attract users by providing a good service. Once they’re locked in, you squeeze them for all they’re worth by switching focus to business customers. Once they’re locked in, you squeeze them by threatening to deny them access to the users on whom they now depend.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        I had also described it elsewhere as the “suck all the value out before it’s dead” phase. They’re clearly no longer interested about growing the site; they’re just getting as much money as possible from their traffic and engagement history as possible now, because they know traffic and engagement is already declining.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Big profit now is better than our long term image

      ~ Reddit shareholders

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reddit only exists because of an open net and sharing content, noe they just suddenly determined that an open net is bad.

    A common strategy, but it fucking sucks.

    Fuck you reddit.

  • rhabarba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reddit says web clients have visited their public, free website without permission.

    Fixed.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t think the content on Reddit is their to sell…unless resistors are getting a cut. That site is a dumpster and needs to die already.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reddit CEO can shove reddit up his ass sideways. The whole thing.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      He can put his dick in /dontputyourdickinthat

      Aside: I give Lemmy serious props for not reproducing some of these communities btw.

  • fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    If this gains any traction, I hope every news site, blog, etc sues Reddit for profiting off their material that fills the entire site. The comment section wouldn’t exist if there wasn’t something to comment on in the first place. Digg and Reddit didn’t even have comments at first. It was ALL content from other sources. Even “reddit original content” is" original content from a creator posted to Reddit". Reddits “value” is ephemeral.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    To commemorate Steve “Greedy Pigboy” Huffman’s assertiveness, I’ve made some memes. Enjoy.