• FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone clearly doesn’t understand how much it used to cost to travel by plane 50 years ago.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also this image is bullshit

      Tray tables are about half that size now.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not on longer flights. It doesn’t benefit airlines much to make smaller tray tables

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Save on weight means save on gas. Multiply that by thousands of flights and it adds up. United printed their in flight magazines on lighter paper and saved hundreds of thousands of dollars, just by using thinner paper.

          They only eliminated 5kg per 737, but that added up to $290k savings.

          If anything I think it’d be even more effective on longer flights as those jets spend more time in cruise vs short haul airliners.

          By using lighter paper to print their in-flight magazine, Hemisphere, United Airlines saves up to 170,000 gallons of fuel, which cuts about $290,000 in annual fuel costs.

          One magazine is now one 29 g lighter and weights 195 g which will make a usual 737 plane that carries 179 passengers 5 kg lighter on average.

          https://www.kiwi.com/stories/united-prints-lighter-magazine-saves-170000-gallons-fuel/

          • slaacaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Good example, aviation is probably the most penny-fucking business in the planet, it’s a life and death fight between the companies, trying to keep costs low.

          • morrowind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            United makes 50B in revenue a year. I’m guessing that stunt gave them more value in marketing than actual savings.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              You clearly do not understand basic math nor how rampant greed in capitalism works. Sad.

              If it saves them money, they WILL do it. (or even appears to save money)

              Or do you think Scrooge types aren’t literally known for penny-pinching when they’re already rich and wouldn’t even notice the pennies going missing?

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I suppose I don’t take many long flights and I don’t recall how much space I had on the last long flight I had.

          Typically on my domestic flights I have a tray table that won’t fit my switch if I want to stand it up.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ehh…

        The bottom line

        Proportionally (inflation considered), flights are much cheaper now than they were 50 years ago. Consequently, flying is a more accessible mode of transport for many and has resulted in the soaring popularity of air travel, which began after deregulation. However, despite the cost drop, the base cost of flying has increased as airlines operate small profit margins and seek to remain competitive.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      But back then the price was regulated so they had to compete on service.

      That might have been more that 50 years now.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We are too reliant on air travel as it is. With the advent of the internet we should reduce air travel down to permitted leisure/visiting family and migration. Businesses should be able to video confernced most transactions. The situations where you absolutely need on site representation can be reduced drastically.

    That is, if you took climate change seriously.

    • Xanis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      HA. So look, I do agree. Problem is businesses don’t care, even if we do. If you figure out a way to stop management across way too many professions from holding hour long meetings to talk about some data point that has so significance to what is actually happening, and those “leaders” who call meetings early to get the team together, when the whole damn thing could be in an email…yeah man, when you solve that, I’ll work with you to solve the rest.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ok, but like I’m not going to solve it. It’s not also going to be solved today. I’m just saying you want to gripe about your shitty airplane experience like we need to make it a luxury resort when really we need to stop pumping carbon into the atmosphere.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Businesses should be able to video confernce most transactions.

      Almost everyone who travels a lot for work wants this too.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    The people in the top picture still fly like that.
    The people in the bottom picture couldn’t afford to fly at all in the past.

  • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    So I remember taking a flight 10 years ago and they gave us pretzel pieces from snyders. I thought, great, we don’t even get whole pretzels…

    Next flight, they give us generic “trail mix” in clear bags. The kind the old folks down the street would give out at Halloween because it was “healthy.” but that contained approximately 2 pretzels the size of quarters, 3 peanuts, 3 generic m&ms, and 2 raisins…

    It gave me the impression that airlines are like schools, where the flight staff are the ones bringing in the snacks because the airline is too cheap to supply them.

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      My teacher friends live in big houses and travel all over the world but you know whatever. I don’t.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          My grandparents were both teachers and are rich. Granted one was a professor, but the other a public school teacher.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            In any case, anecdotes do not and cannot disprove the actual statistics.

            Also, if you live in a country that actually respects intelligence, I’d HOPE your teachers are actually paid well. Sadly, the US despises intelligence right now…

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              In dying rural areas in the US teachers are generally some of the best paid. Its mostly in cities where their pay lags. But no, they live in the US in LA(CA, not the state). Also, FYI just because I live in one country doesn’t mean its the same my grandparents live in.

              • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Ahh yes, California, a state that pays more, AND in LA, where wages are WAY higher because cost of living is way higher…

                Thank you for describing why your anecdote is an outlier and DEFINITELY doesn’t prove any norm.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Thank you for describing why your anecdote is an outlier and DEFINITELY doesn’t prove any norm.

                  Where did I say it was the norm??? You called someone a liar for giving an anecdote. Outliers do happen…

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Airliner ticket prices used to be regulated. So when all airlines had to charge the same price, they had to find other ways to be competitive in order to bring in customers. Deregulation in the 70s brought ticket costs down but that means ticket cost is now the primary point of competition between airlines and amenities now come at a steep premium.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, you can have it one way or the other…cheap flights or super luxury and only the rich can fly. Planes are not cheap to operate and fuel isn’t free.

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not so sure that is a positive. Airplanes are huge emission drivers and our dependence on the convenience of air travel has caused us to cease investment and innovation in other more efficient and environmentally friendly methods of travel.

        No doubt there’d be a lot more support for high speed rails if airplanes weren’t as accessible. IMO airplanes should only really be used for intercontinental travel.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          When you factor in the number of people the airplane carries, they are about 3 times more efficient than a car with one person in it.

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              Ελληνικά
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Just saying, compared to driving, airplanes are usually better. Also trains in the US suck. Much slower, and almost comparable in price to air travel.

              • BigBenis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Also trains in the US suck. Much slower, and almost comparable in price to air travel.

                It doesn’t have to be that way, many other countries have solved those issues. But because we’ve leaned so heavily on air travel to get us to places only a few hours away by land there hasn’t been any incentive to innovate or invest in other forms of long-distance mass transit.

          • BigBenis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Are you saying a high speed train to your destination wouldn’t also solve that problem? It would likely end up being cheaper to travel via rail considering the lower costs of maintenance and fuel, meaning further accessibility than we have today with our dependence on air travel.

              • BigBenis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s fair, and please note that I mentioned air travel has its place in intercontinental travel in my previous comment. The whole point I’m trying to make is that domestic flights between areas that could support high speed land travel infrastructure are wasteful.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Even within continents, high speed rail is expensive, many cities and towns aren’t large enough or near large enough cities to make it practical. This would mean distant connections on slow trains and very long journeys.

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Eh, if you’re looking for the cheapest ticket available you can’t really expect luxury. Airlines are competing with prices, so all luxury goes off the window like a passenger on a Boeing flight

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Stupid. The cost for flights then was more like beyond first class prices now.

    • dtrain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Stupid. The cost for flights then was more like beyond first class prices now.

      And a lot more smoky.

      • abcd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        This reminded me of that one flight as a kid, when I was seated in a row with two smokers. I literally couldn’t breathe. I’m happy that my kids don’t have to experience shit like this.

      • tpihkal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t like the smoke? Then sit on the other side of the aisle in the non-smoking section.

  • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because our children’s children will still be paying the tab for that unsustainable opulence. Fuck they’ll be paying the bill for recreational air travel with only pretzels.

  • roboto@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You guys get snacks?

    With Ryanair I’m thankful that they have to offer a seat.

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    The amount of people who think flying is a normal thing. One percent of the worlds population produce 50% of aviation emissions. And most off the worlds population never fly in their life.