• lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    The aggressor is not always wrong, the underdog is not always right, morality has no Monopoly over the truth.

    That being said, I think that the Ukrainian people have paid too much, in more than just coin. It is hard not to empathize their cause.

      • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you for the context. I read up a bit and it seems that due to poor management by the Ukrainian government, since 1994 the Donbas province has suffered from poverty and a harsh life. Also, despite voting to become Independent, their votes were ignored by the Ukrainian government (Now I understand why Putin is calling the Ukrainian facists… I just thought he went demented).

        I wonder why this story isn’t told, why the people of the donbas didn’t appeal to the UN to establish independence (or Russia, if they wanted to become Russians)… Why did it end up such a bloody mess instead of a diplomatic solution? This war doesn’t come off as a liberation war.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          why the people of the donbas didn’t appeal to the UN to establish independence

          They did. No country outside of South Ossetia, itself an unrecognized country, recognized their independence. Sadly not even Cuba did when specifically asked. Yes that means Russia also didn’t. Despite significant internal pressure to do that (most significantly, by the communist party), Putin and Russian government hoped for peaceful resolution by the Minsk agreements. This turned out to be mistake since both west and Ukraine never intended to honor those agreements but used them to arm up Ukraine. Between 2014 and 2022 international situation changed significantly though, Ukraine buildup for the all out invasion of Donbas finally forced Russian govt to decide, either join the war or just watch as Donbas is massacred (and potentially risk political instablity in crucial time since it would be incredibly unpopular move which could easily lead to lose nationalist support for govt).

          • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, I’ll assume it to be correct. I can’t corroborate much except for the Minsk agreements, but they make the rest make sense since Russia tried to negotiate these twice.

            I can see why Russia intervened, I can’t see why Russia committed mass murder on civilian population.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can’t see why Russia committed mass murder on civilian population.

              They didn’t. Civilian losses are very low in that war, UN estimated it for around 10000 dead (for both sides). Compare it to when US Shock and Awe any country and kill milllions. Russia is incredibly restrained as far as the modern warfare goes.

              • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The numbers seem expected, not low. Bucha is probably an exception to the rule, but mass Graves are not a pretty sight.

                Also, the fact that America is a multiple war crimes veteren doesn’t negate my original claim. A serial killer doesn’t make a single murder ok, arguments don’t work that way - rhetorically.

                • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Bucha is a red herring. The event was thoroughly investigated the very day after it was suddenly mediatized, and two pieces of evidence stick out:

                  1. The mayor of Bucha, when UA retook control of the city, made no reference to any mass murders or anything. He certainly would have mentioned it if he knew about it.
                  2. Videos were filmed shortly (a day or two) also before UA retook the city, and there were no bodies in the streets.

                  These civilians were killed by Ukraine. They didn’t publicize it right after they retook the city, it took them a few days to talk about it – plenty of time to commit a massacre. There’s more inconsistencies but these are the two big ones to me. Like some people raised the problem that the bodies looked very fresh (and that nobody talked about the massacre online before UA retook the city), when the official narrative was that the massacre was committed a month before.

                  edit: as for mass graves, one of them I believe to have been made by Ukraine. I couldn’t tell you which one exactly though at this time, but Esha K. talked about it on twitter. Russia had made proper graves and even brought UA POWs to witness the processions. They filmed everything and that’s why I mentioned Esha, she has the video on her twitter somewhere. They had also offered to send the bodies to Ukraine for proper burial, which Ukraine refused. So they buried these soldiers themselves. Ukraine then opened the graves and threw the bodies in a mass grave to once again pin something on Russia.

                  Remember that Ukraine has committed verifiable war crimes (they boast about them) in just the first months of the war, I posted about this before trying to keep track of them.

                  There was another red herring, a woman supposedly wearing nail polish, which NAFO trolls jumped on to claim she was a civilian, but there are women in the UA army and they’re allowed to wear nail polish like you don’t stop wearing it just because you’re a soldier. So it doesn’t mean anything.

                  • YEP [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The nyt(yea I know) deep dive convinced me at least a large part of killings were carried out by Russian soldiers. Tying phones, street cameras and other evidence to specific deaths was fairly exhaustive. It seems a case of revenge killing and is still a war crime. Massacres do happen and soldiers who commit them should be prosecuted, although I doubt the nyt would spend the hours to do this and call for the prosecutions on Americans for the millions who died in the middle east. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/12/21/world/europe/bucha-ukraine-massacre-victims.html

                    You can say well the Ukrainian push for regular people to fight back or whatever leads to things like this and you can be right. I don’t think that gets these soldiers off the hook.

                • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Expected? By whom? Liberals seems to expect millions because they as usual projected the US army standard. I said America not because some kind of dreaded whataboutism or deflections, i used that example because as foremost warmonger on the planet they do set up the standard of contemporary warfare, which is to bomb everything, drone weddings, burn cities with white phosphorus, poison the earth and people with defoliants and depleted uranium, drop millions of bombs that kill people even decades later… and look, they are sending the same shit to Ukraine.

                  • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Expected because during 1948 in the Israeli independence war (also known as Nakba for the Palestinians), 10000 Palestinian civilians died in multiple instances including several war crimes. Comparatively to other wars where civilian population was involved, it sounds about right. Doesn’t mean that every war will end up in 10k, it just makes sense due to a comparison. Used here not as an argument in and of itself, but as a ruler to measure expectations.

                    And again, your well founded accusations of America as being worse than Russia doesn’t make Russia free of blame. If you killed 50 people, does that mean that if I kill you, I’m a hero that showed restraint? No. I’m a criminal. I’m not a serial murderer, but I am a murderer nonetheless. Even a police officer that were to kill you would be under an investigation to establish that he had no choice, and if proven that he could’ve brought you to justice alive, he would face prison (at least, if the justice system works).

                    Also, I am not American. I am not saying America is ok. Right now, America is getting rich off of death of Russians and Ukrainians the same way they’ve been doing since 1910 - as the world’s largest arms dealer. Their capitalist hunger fuels a military industrial complex that spreads war, chaos and death. America is also hypocritical enough to be fighting a proxy war with Russia through the Ukraine in retaliation of the Russian invasion, under the guise of “We supply weapons”. Bullshit they do more than supply weapons and aid. They train Ukrainian soliders and send free mercenaries in.

      • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you refer to NATO encroaching on the Russian federation or is there something I’m not aware of?

        • Edward (any)@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That plus the coup, that led to the problems with the Russian language (?) and subsequent shelling and war in the east.