• Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t necessarily as true as it once was. X86 has made a lot of ground in power efficiency and ARM has made a lot of ground in performance

      • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Intel chips are still quite hot and use older process nodes which are less efficient. They have been pushing performance over efficiency recently as well. If this was AMD hardware on N5 I would agree with you, but sadly it isn’t.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s true in general, but Intel Atom is quite promising IIRC, and efficiency cores + improvements to their fabs should only continue to improve the situation.

          I’m not saying the old logic of “ARM is efficient, x86 is fast” isn’t still true, but it’s becoming less true, and they’re kind of converging to be similar chips but with different starting points (i.e., the needs are becoming more similar, and the differences are becoming lesser).

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The processors do, that doesn’t mean the desktop Linux distributions are well optimised for it. The available Linux phones have garbage battery life and a bunch of other issues.