Hi! I came here looking for an alternative to Reddit which is less of a liberal echo chamber. It looks good, even more responsive. But I wonder, how is the moderation here? Biggest problem I have with Reddit is that it is becoming increasingly impossible to have discussions about “sensitive topics”. Even if you are being civil, there is a chance you will just straight out get banned for saying something which liberals do not like. How does Lemmy compare? Thanks.

    • 'M' as in 'MANCY'@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine saying a woman isn’t a woman and thinking you’re being civil.

      You’ll find an instance that fits your liking though, I’m sure. Most other instances won’t be federated with it but you don’t want to live in our “liberal echo chamber” anyway.

        • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re right, I’m totally a liberal now. You guys converted me. Thanks so much.

      • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, that would be civil. It’s just an opinion. It is not attacking or name calling.

        But let me ask you this: if you agree with all this, why did you come here then? Reddit would be great for you then, no?

          • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            That way of thinking is part of the problem. It doesn’t matter how important you think those opinions are, they are still opinions.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah… You’re not going to have a good time with expressing those kinds of views here or through most of the Fediverse. Most of us are not willing to tolerate proto-genocidal opinions, which is what you appear to be espousing, drawn to its logical conclusion.

              • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you’re saying that liberals can’t avoid thinking in absolutes? Which means I just have to accept that discussions with them are impossible? I know there are exceptions though, you already seem to be better than most.

          • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do not want a safe haven, I want a place where things can be discussed freely. But what is your answer to my question? Why do you or why do liberals come here if it is not about the politics?

            • thisNotMyName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well you can discuss everything here - as long as you stay civil. There are not even worthless internet points to lose. But from what I’ve read from your comments here, you will face different opinions and you may should thinking about them and your own, too

            • 'M' as in 'MANCY'@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t realize liberals must congregate on Reddit. I must have missed that memo.

              I left Reddit for many reasons, and I don’t owe you an explanation on any of them.

      • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t matter, even IF that were true, it still doesn’t make it “hate speech”.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would you even listen if someone linked peer reviewed research to you? Sounds like you’re just looking for your own echochamber to reinforce your own belief system (which is ironically what you say you’re trying to get away from)

          • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Dude your whole way of reacting shows exactly what I hate, and want to get away from. You are not even responding to what I said, instead you start going into the trans debate itself because you want to assert your stance so much.

          • kwekkie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t really have a definition for that, it’s a liberal term I think. I think people just have to be civil and not jerks, that’s the basic rule. But if people are going to be sensitive to certain opinions and standpoints, those people are going to want to say that those standpoints are “hate speech”. That is the whole problem.

        • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Refusing to accept someone and trying to force your own opinion on them is hate no matter how “civil” you think you’re being.

    • danielton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      So… I’m a centrist who gets crap here for believing everybody raises at least some valid points…

      But fuck off with the homophobic bullshit. This ain’t the place for you. LGBT rights are human rights. End of discussion.