Google ramps up its campaign against ad blockers on Chrome.

    • mke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      They might simply prefer it, or be in an environment where they have no choice (e.g. office, education).

      I’m a stubborn Firefox user but I have to say, this feels a little aggressive and not at all likely to convince anyone to switch.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        So you’re saying they’d be allowed to sideload a discontinued chrome extension onto their work laptop but not allowed to download another legitimate browser? Yea…not buying it. Same with an educational setting. Pretty sure the person I reaponded to just simply is used to Chrome and doesn’t want change (which I do understand.)

        • mintdaniel42@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          I prefer to have a “cryptobro” chromium browser that not only supports five html and js features but is actually leading in html 5 support and not lacking 2 years behind

        • mintdaniel42@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Yes I know that but firefox is lacking features. An old chromium browser on mobile has the same amount of points in benchmarks as the newest firefox on desktop

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I stripped it from all google crap, extra features, etc. Then the features I want I added in using an extension I wrote and maintain myself