t0fr@lemmy.ca to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoNot that you guys need the reminder, but your work sees all your browser history and you may not even be able to delete it if you wanted tolemmy.caimagemessage-square238fedilinkarrow-up1502arrow-down114
arrow-up1488arrow-down1imageNot that you guys need the reminder, but your work sees all your browser history and you may not even be able to delete it if you wanted tolemmy.cat0fr@lemmy.ca to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square238fedilink
minus-squareangelsomething@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYes but all we see is a MAC address and the device ip. Also we have dns-over-https and No other identifier is parsed through. So we can see and block someone browsing porn on the guest Wi-Fi, but we’d never know who it was.
minus-square1984@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYour ethics goes out the window when being told to do something by your employer. Maybe you try to look out for the user, but it’s completely wrong that employees should have to trust you to do that. “Company being protected from misuse” is a blanket term for survellience, same as “fighting terrorism”. I still stand by my opinion. Companies need to trust employees and not run survellience programs against them. It’s just wrong.
Yes but all we see is a MAC address and the device ip. Also we have dns-over-https and No other identifier is parsed through. So we can see and block someone browsing porn on the guest Wi-Fi, but we’d never know who it was.
Your ethics goes out the window when being told to do something by your employer.
Maybe you try to look out for the user, but it’s completely wrong that employees should have to trust you to do that.
“Company being protected from misuse” is a blanket term for survellience, same as “fighting terrorism”.
I still stand by my opinion. Companies need to trust employees and not run survellience programs against them. It’s just wrong.