The Epic First Run programme allows developers of any size to claim 100% of revenue if they agree to make their game exclusive on the Epic Games Store for six months.

After the six months are up, the game will revert to the standard Epic Games Store revenue split of 88% for the developer and 12% for Epic Games.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As a patient gamer, who hates enticements to get stuck in yet-another-walled garden, I refuse to go with Epic. The benevolent kingdom of steam never forces exclusivity deals, and just out of self interest i wont reward behavior that removes options from me.

    I guess this means I’ll have to wait at least 6 months for some games to show up on steam

    I’m ok with other ecosystems, if they treat people right, like GoG, I’m cool with GoG.

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll have to wait at least 6 months for some games to show up on steam.

      It raises a fun ethical question: Is piracy moral if you fully intend on buying the game at full price when it hits Steam in six months?

      Spare me the “piracy is always moral” arguments; Even as a fellow pirate, the mental gymnastics to justify it get old quickly. Just admit that you won’t/can’t pay for something. So the question is whether or not the morality comes into play when you DO intend on buying the game as soon as it’s available on your preferred platform.

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Patient gamer does mean actually be patient. If someone is playing a pirated game I would say that doesn’t count as patience with them not depriving themselves of anything.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some games are already like this. Borderlands stuff has been an Epic exclusive for a year ish in the past. I played on other platforms to avoid it. I don’t know if that’s still the case or if Borderlands 3 was the exception.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if a game is stuck in Steam’s walled garden it’s ok, but if it’s stuck in Epic’s walled garden then it’s wrong?

      • mammut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A lot of people seem to view it this way. Borderlands 2 was Steam exclusive for like 5 years and very few people complained, but Borderlands 3 was EGS exclusive for 6 months and tons of people flipped out.

        • NightOwl@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think Valve went out of their way to bribe 2k into signing a contract to prevent them from releasing on other platforms. Like Xbox did with Tomb Raider preventing launch release on Sony.

          Or do you not understand the distinction? At least play the “well it’s PC so what is the big deal over downloading another launcher” card if you are going to try and argue the exclusive angle.