• Nefyedardu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why the snark? I literally used the term “comically heinous” myself to describe the examples. I am aware they are extreme, it was to demonstrate my point…

    So we disagree on where that line should be drawn. And it comes down to the fact that you think blocking traffic is “mildly inconveniencing”. I would say: how the fuck do you know? You don’t know what’s going on in the lives of those people.

    • Maybe someone got a call from the hospital that their father is dying and they should come in to see them one last time.
    • Maybe a food insecure parent is working hard to support their children and if they are late one more time they could get axed and put their children in danger.
    • Maybe someone chopped their finger off and are rushing to the hospital to get it reattached.

    Or any number of scenarios. If YOU were in any of these situations, what would you think of the people blocking the road? Somehow I don’t think you would be so understanding when it happens to you personally.

    But again, what way that hasn’t been tried would be ok in your book? Asking people nicely?

    I think my position is clear. I’m OK with any form of protest that actually advances the cause behind the protest and I am not OK with any form of protest that is counter-productive against the cause of the protest. I started out my comments by saying what standing in a road accomplishes, and so far all you’ve really said is “uh, well nothing else has worked so why not?”. That really isn’t good enough.