• angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I think it’s understandable. Intelligence is partly hereditary and people want clever children. Education and job can give you at least an overall idea of the person you’re having a child with. It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

      In my mind “being inseminated by” is like 1% of “having a child with”, if that. It’s probably the least consequential thing your father may do in your overall upbringing.

        • blakestacey@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          OK, you could in principle have made that sound worse, for example by saying “females” like a goddamn Ferengi, but still, pretty impressive.

          • angrystego@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 minutes ago

            And that was my whole point, I was reacting to V0ldek’s: “being inseminated by…is the least consequential thing”, which they proposed was not important from the child’s point of view. I wanted to point out it’s rather different (in a bad way) from the woman’s point of view.

            Is that a bad thing? Where did I go wrong in expressing myself? Or did I misunderstand V0ldek’s comment?