I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
That right there, that’s why you get my down-lemm. It’s a negative, sweeping generalization against the very platform you’re on and is sexist. I don’t feel it meaningfully contributes to the discussion.
I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
You’re getting downvoted because of your accusations which are batshit crazy, not because people disagree with you. Liberals don’t give a shit about what happens to Bill Clinton, progressives want him locked up and tankies want to execute him. No one is defending Bill Clinton here.
What people are saying is that there’s an election nearing its end, and the fate of Bill Clinton is right now completely irrelevant to this election, unlike Trump’s fate, because Trump is a man who is one of the two candidates, and Clinton isn’t.
If you then keep pointing out the existence of Bill Clinton multiple times, no one even understands what you’re arguing for. You want to persecute Bill? Okay, sounds good. How is this relevant to this election?
Or maybe you get downvoted for your general “woe is me”, “all of Lemmy is bad” attitude…
I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
That right there, that’s why you get my down-lemm. It’s a negative, sweeping generalization against the very platform you’re on and is sexist. I don’t feel it meaningfully contributes to the discussion.
You’re getting downvoted because of your accusations which are batshit crazy, not because people disagree with you. Liberals don’t give a shit about what happens to Bill Clinton, progressives want him locked up and tankies want to execute him. No one is defending Bill Clinton here.
What people are saying is that there’s an election nearing its end, and the fate of Bill Clinton is right now completely irrelevant to this election, unlike Trump’s fate, because Trump is a man who is one of the two candidates, and Clinton isn’t.
If you then keep pointing out the existence of Bill Clinton multiple times, no one even understands what you’re arguing for. You want to persecute Bill? Okay, sounds good. How is this relevant to this election?