With the Voice to Parliament Referendum date announced to be October 14 2023, this thread will run in the lead up to the date for general discussions/queries regarding the Voice to Parliament.

The Proposed Constitutional Amendment

Chapter IX Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

129 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice

In recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia:

there shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice; the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice may make representations to the Parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples; the Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.

Past Discussions

Here are some previous posts in this community regarding the referendum:

Common Misinformation

  • “The Uluru Statement from the Heart is 26 Pages not 1” - not true

Government Information

Amendments to this post

If you would like to see some other articles or posts linked here please let me know and I’ll try to add it as soon as possible.

  1. Added the proposed constitutional amendment (31/08/2023)
  2. Added Common Misinformation section (01/07/2023)

Discussion / Rules

Please follow the rules in the sidebar and for aussie.zone in general. Anything deemed to be misinformation or with malicious intent will be removed at moderators’ discretion. This is a safe space to discuss your opinion on the voice or ask general questions.

Please continue posting news articles as separate posts but consider adding a link to this post to encourage discussion.

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    21·
    1 year ago

    It’s an absolutely pathetic sample size.

    No it’s not. It would be a standard sample size for a nationwide poll if we were dealing with the entirety of Australia’s voting population, and in this case we are limited to a significantly smaller number of people. You are essentially claiming that every political poll is completely useless because they all have an “absolutely pathetic sample size” according to you.

    By your own favourite poll, 20% don’t support it.

    Wrong. The No vote was between 10 and 14% across those two polls. That is not “lots”, it is a minority.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      11·
      1 year ago

      You are essentially claiming that every political poll is completely useless because they all have an “absolutely pathetic sample size” according to you.

      Most are, yes.

      Using a poll of unknown selection criteria and size of 700 people to determine the popularity of an entire population is stupid and should be taken with a grain of salt - like all tiny polls like that. They can say their margin of error is 2% or whatever they want but it doesn’t make it true.

      Wrong. The No vote was between 10 and 14% across those two polls. That is not “lots”, it is a minority.

      If only 80% of them support it, 20% don’t. Math, how does it work?

      Also a minority can still be “lots” 🤣. Words, how do they work? You’re saying that there aren’t lots of indigenous people then, since they’re a minority, right?

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        11·
        1 year ago

        like all tiny polls like that.

        The YouGov poll was not “tiny”. It was of a normal size. What do you find difficult about this concept?

        If only 80% of them support it, 20% don’t. Math, how does it work?

        The Ipsos poll reported 80% Yes, 10% No, 10% Undecided. The YouGov poll (the one you keep referencing) reported 83% Yes, 14% No, 4% Undecided. Neither of these polls reported No at 20%, that is a complete fabrication on your part. Stop lying.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          11·
          1 year ago

          The YouGov poll was not “tiny”.

          Was that the 732 person one? If it was, it’s tiny.

          It was of a normal size. What do you find difficult about this concept?

          It can be the “normal” size for a poll while also being tiny/small. These things aren’t mutually exclusive. Again, words, how do they work?

          Neither of these polls reported No at 20%, that is a complete fabrication on your part. Stop lying.

          If you’re not voting yes you’re voting no. If you’re undecided and don’t vote yes, it’s a no. This is embarrassing for you. If you don’t vote yes, you’re against it even if you are “undecided”.

          The Ipsos poll reported

          Is that the one that was only 300 people? 🤣

          • Ilandar@aussie.zone
            11·
            1 year ago

            By your braindead logic, the undecided responses can also be interpreted as support for Yes because they failed to indicate their support for No. According to you, Indigenous support for Yes is between 87% and 90%.

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              12·
              1 year ago

              If you’re undecided on an issue you don’t support it.

              You should probably just go back to virtue signalling and calling people racist.

              • Ilandar@aussie.zone
                1·
                1 year ago

                If you’re undecided on an issue you don’t support it.

                If you’re undecided on an issue, you haven’t decided whether you support it. That’s why they call it undecided.

                You should probably just go back to virtue signalling and calling people racist.

                ???

                • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                  11·
                  1 year ago

                  If you’re undecided it means you don’t currently support it.

                  Might have got you mixed up with one of the virtue signalling “everyone who votes no is racist” posters, if so I apologise.