The 6-3 decision, which turned on the court’s interpretation of the First Amendment, appeared to suggest that the rights of L.G.B.T.Q. people are on more vulnerable legal footing, particularly when they are at odds with claims of religious freedom.
Apparently LGBTQ rights take a backseat to “religious freedom.”
Interesting theory. There will be precedent to use this tactic of creating strawman cases for future things rightwing do not like.