As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is “not radical” given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

“It’s time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay,” Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

“It’s time,” he continued, “that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress.”

    • books@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t a 32 hour work week, keeping the same wage, sort of raise the minimum wage by default? I work full time, work less hours, and keep the same wage?

      • BearGun@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kind of, except you might still need to work multiple jobs because one doesn’t pay enough to keep you alive

      • matter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, yes, but the minimum wage should probably also still increase more than the average, since it is still the lowest-paid who are getting screwed hardest of all

        • subignition@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is why we need unions.

          The autoworkers union the article refers to as an example is seeking a 46% pay rise to coincide with the transition to 32 hours.