The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

  • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    No landlord is a good person. The sisters, even if assholes, doesn’t excuse the fact that the landlord is also an asshole simply by being a landlord.

    • Smk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, no landlord are good person. What kind of argument is this ? Like, literally? I know some are asshole ? But some a very kind and appreciative too? What’s your point ? No one should be allowed to rent their property ever ?

      • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re trying to pretend landlords only exist in a vacuum instead of in society where people can’t afford the necessities for basic survival. Landlords play a huge role in making sure housing prices are above a “natural” level, all while contributing no productive value to society. There’s a reason why plenty of capitalists are against rentiers.

        • Smk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My position is like the most nuanced in the world while.yours is the most radical. Landlord maintains their assets while the renter does not have to think about it. That’s the benefit of being a renter and that’s why there is a market. Stop being radical, it does not help at all.

      • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m 5 years old because I think being a good person and being a landlord are mutually exclusive? What’s your reasoning?

        • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not that guy but: your reasoning in terms of economics shows the nuance and depth of a toddler, therefore you’re either 5 years old or a commie.

          Answering their question clears up which one it is.

          • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plenty of capitalists believe that people like rentiers, i.e. landlords, are an abomination to an economy. You don’t know much about economics, do you?

            • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know no fucking capitalist would bring “being a good person” into a conversation about economics, which you clearly don’t, so…

              • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then you don’t know a lot of people nor know much about economics. Economics isn’t separated from the rest of society, it exists within society. The world is full of capitalists who also have opinions on what is and isn’t good and moral and know that people spending that money attributes to goodness and badness. For example, this is how taxes are often used, to incentivize good behavior and penalize bad behavior.

                I think you need to spend sometime away from the internet and start talking to actual human beings around you, as you seem to be stuck in some weird anarcho-capitalist online bubble.