• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like a good way to get a lot of retired folk to lose their property over taxes, as land value rises above their means

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like they should sell their house - which has netted them a nice profit - and downsize. Or do a reverse mortgage.

      • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And move where? Why have retired people (who are most likely on a fixed income and have paid off their home in some cases) to move from a home they’ve paid off to an apartment/living center with obscene monthly payments? Or introduce another ever rising tax on something they should have been able to age peacefully in without as much financial worry? That seems cruel. I’m no fan of boomers, but damn.

        I feel like best plan here would be to impose steeper taxes on second-plus properties. You can have your primary residence, but every home after that accrues a higher and higher tax. Especially on LLCs.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If tax goes up, it’s because the value of your asset has gone up. Either sell it or do a reverse mortgage. I have no pity for those profiting from the system, regardless of their age. Fuck you, Grandma, pay your taxes.

          I feel like best plan here would be to impose steeper taxes on second-plus properties.

          That’s definitely part of it, and more important than taxes on primary residence. But we should do both.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like best plan here would be to impose steeper taxes on second-plus properties

          I think we have that where I live, although after 20+ years of owning I still don’t really understand property taxes here.

          Anyhow, the property tax has a basic definition but I believe you get a reduction in assessed value for primary residence. That effectively taxes second homes more

    • spitfire@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There won’t be any other taxes for them to pay, so they will have more purchasing power. Chances are, they’re still going to have the same place unless that retired guy decides to build a hotel or something on it.