• 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It boils down to abolishing private ownership of the means of production. The fruits of labour of society must belong to society, not just a handful of people that have been inheriting wealth generation after generation.

    • trailing9@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does it have to be exclusive? Society right now can own means of production. Cooperatives, joined-stock cooperations or foundations could be used to hold ownership and the fruits of labor could be shared.

      If the majority is not willing to organize labor right now, who could take over the role of billionaires without abusing their position of power?

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        who could take over the role of billionaires without abusing their position of power?

        The billionaires abuse their power. The problem of an abusive manager being totally solved is an irrational height to set the bar at.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Billionaires already represent societal detriments by the very nature of the absurd concentration of wealth into the hands of an individual.

            Also billionaires tend not to personally manage things, which may be to save time for doing more abuse (see Elon)