merridew@feddit.uk to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoX “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers arguearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1181arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkX “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers arguearstechnica.commerridew@feddit.uk to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square17fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoI am not a betting man and I can’t predict the future, but I would wager that fewer people would trust Twitter as a bank than would pay them $8 a month for a blue checkmark, which will probably be required to use it as a bank.
I am not a betting man and I can’t predict the future, but I would wager that fewer people would trust Twitter as a bank than would pay them $8 a month for a blue checkmark, which will probably be required to use it as a bank.