• OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol alright buddy. You are the one to talk about tone policing.

    If you make claims it’s your duty to back them up and defend them. If you don’t want to, then don’t lie tk begin with.

    I didn’t lie. You merely don’t want to believe me. Which is fine by me. I have no obligation to convince you otherwise. The world doesn’t spin around you.

    can’t even give a single link

    I’m not here to hold an academic discussion, or waste my time arguing with debatebros. You were shown a link already, and it’s pretty clear you aren’t actually interested in it. Why would I send you more links?

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t want to believe you until you provide a source. Why should I take you at your word. What makes your word so infallible?

      Is it that hard to understand.

      You can’t make claims, and then when pushed simply say “Trust me bro”

      • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying “trust me bro”. I’m saying go ahead and use google on your own time. I’m not interested in convincing you. I stated my opinion and explained it. If you want to do something with that go ahead. If not, then I simply don’t care. I don’t know how I can say this more plainly.

        I’ve seen how you engaged the other person who gave you the link to the video. I can tell how entrenched you are in your beliefs that you will nitpick your way out of anything. I’ve also noticed how you will not back up your own claims with “sources”. Because you aren’t actually interested in “sources”. You are simply using that as a lazy excuse to avoid having a normal discussion with someone, like a normal person would.