• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you. But I don’t feel the urge to commit suicide. I don’t think the hypothetical person would either.

      How would you like me to talk to you?

      • RubiksIsocahedron@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t want you to talk to me - I want you to listen to me and internalize what I teach you. Saying anything back is simply the petulant resistance of a child that won’t eat their vegetables.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am listening to you. But I don’t think you want to listen to me.

          Is there nothing I could say that would convince you that not everyone is trying to kill you?

          • RubiksIsocahedron@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think you want to listen to me.

            Why would I? All you’d do is tell me lies, or otherwise speak in bad faith with intent to harm.

            Is there nothing I could say that would convince you that not everyone is trying to kill you?

            NO! The entire goddamned point is that I refuse to be dominated by you - that includes my mind. My mind is off limits - ONLY I can change it. Every attempt anyone else makes to change it is interpreted as an attempt to brainwash - equivalent to assault.

            Only actions matter - but the time to act was over forty years ago. Waiting until I am the edge of death to act is itself an act of bad faith.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              If there’s absolutely nothing I can do to convince you, it isn’t a logical argument you’re going with. It’s a philosophical or emotional one. Logical evidence based arguments would change if compelling contrary evidence was provided.

                  • RubiksIsocahedron@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The problem with telling you is that it helps you fake the evidence. I have to assume that once I tell you, everything you give that looks like that evidence must be assumed to be faked.

                    Evidence can exist, but human beings are too dishonest to present it. Human beings cannot be trusted - and humanity’s history of dishonesty is all the proof I need for that. I will never trust human beings, as a moral compunction.