• admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s so blue.

    Like, I know it’s not news. And I know in “true color” it’s closer to grey. But Jupiter was not blue when I was a kid. It’s just so much more colorful. So much more going on. so much more dynamic and complicated.

    I cannot comprehend how anyone could ever think sending probes out to take pictures is a waste of money, even ignoring all the real and applicable science that can come from it.

    • Yewb@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are like why do X when Y is still a problem?

      I get that but the world is big why not do both?

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we want to solve global warming and survive as a society, extraplanetary research is crucial. When we look outward, we learn about things that apply inward. NASA has something like a 17-1 return on investments. Every dollar we put into NASA returns so much more in tech and knowledge we can apply to help people here. It’s always a good investment.

      • tom_the_red@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Going one step further, really nothing is true colour. Colour is subjective, and relational, we evolved to compensate for different sun brightnesses and angles, different sky colours. So the constant demand for ‘true colour’ images from space are not only frustrating, they are meaningless. You can provide images with very exacting wavelength information, but you can’t make them true colour because that doesn’t exist.