My gut tells me much more alcohol than coffee is consumed.
I’m wondering about a good way to measure this. It seems unfair to do it by litres of coffee vs. booze, given that concentrations change; and if you focus on kilograms of caffeine vs. litres of alcohol instead, it’s hard to agree on a “good” equivalency.
Caffeine has a second complication - you need to take into account other sources of it (tea, yerba mate), for a remotely useful comparison.
I’d compare number of people who make a conscious choice to indulge in them. Someone who grabs 6 beers in one evening counts the same as someone who does 1 shot of tequila.
One shot of tequila and one bottle of beer have roughly the same alcohol content (give or take) … so the one who’s consuming six times as much is the same? That’s … weird logic.
That makes even less sense, then. He says “counts the same as”. Six beers is not the same as one shot by any metric: volume, mass, alcohol content, nothing.
Because it was just the fastest data source I could find. I was simply looking for any counter example. The point wasn’t strictly about the consumption of coffee vs alcohol, it was that there is an entire internet available to confirm or debunk a gut feeling.
So if you’re going to go into a discussion about public policy, back it up with facts and figures, not gut feelings.
So to highlight the point, not to answer it directly? Got it - that’s fair.
As I mentioned in another comment the situation gets a bit more complex when it comes to booze vs. java. For a single country you could theoretically “equalise” things to the most popular booze vs. the most popular way to prepare coffee. So besides data you also need some arbitration, it’s deceptively more complex than it looks like.
We can argue over how to finesse the numbers to most perfectly represent the statistics until we’re blue in the face, but it’s really not that necessary to make it that complicated. Besides 1 serving of coffee is a pretty well established quantity, and 1 serving of alcohol is also a well established quantity. That semantic argument has already been had and settled years ago so that everyone compiling numbers and taking statistics are all operating on the same page.
Brazil - 80~100mL? (eyeballed, can dig sources if desired)
It gets worse because coffee is ingested in multiple forms in the same place (refer to the Italian example)
and 1 serving of alcohol is also a well established quantity
Ditto as above.
This is not just “semantics” or “arguing to finesse the numbers”. What’s meaningful here, in the context of OP (drugs) and the question (alcohol being potentially more consumed than coffee), would be amount of caffeine vs. ethanol, but this isn’t the sort of stuff that you can simply say “learn to use Alphabet Inc.'s data vulturing tool” and call it a day, you know?
Your initial take was that you don’t need to rely on gut feeling for this, as [ipsis digitis] “there is an entire internet available to confirm or debunk a gut feeling”. And I’m showing that it isn’t as easy as it looks like, and the very fact that you only brought up international standards later - not right off the bat - shows it.
That said, I encourage you to actually read the second link that you’ve provided:
Definitions in various countries // There is no international consensus on how much pure alcohol is contained in a standard drink;[2] values in different countries range from 8g to 20g.
It actually confirms my point.
You’re splitting hairs
Odds are that you’re fully aware that no, I am not “splirring hurrs”.
I’m saying that this should be compared by amounts of alcohol vs. amounts of caffeine, and then arbitrated somehow (say, “x grams of caffeine should be equivalent to x grams of alcohol”). But no, it is not just a “lern2google you baka” as you implied towards the other poster.
EDIT: and it’s blatantly clear that you didn’t even bother to read the first link that you’ve provided. Do it. It does not back up your claim (1 serving of coffee is a pretty well established quantity), it’s about standardisation of quantitative chemistry practices for determination of caffeine content.
My gut tells me much more alcohol than coffee is consumed. I think it would be better to call alcohol the “biggest” drug.
Not to diminish how prevalent caffeine use is. I’m drinking coffee right now.
I’m wondering about a good way to measure this. It seems unfair to do it by litres of coffee vs. booze, given that concentrations change; and if you focus on kilograms of caffeine vs. litres of alcohol instead, it’s hard to agree on a “good” equivalency.
Caffeine has a second complication - you need to take into account other sources of it (tea, yerba mate), for a remotely useful comparison.
I’d compare number of people who make a conscious choice to indulge in them. Someone who grabs 6 beers in one evening counts the same as someone who does 1 shot of tequila.
One shot of tequila and one bottle of beer have roughly the same alcohol content (give or take) … so the one who’s consuming six times as much is the same? That’s … weird logic.
Previous person was comparing volume. So the 6 beers would be way more than one shot. My suggestion was to eliminate that noise from the data.
That makes even less sense, then. He says “counts the same as”. Six beers is not the same as one shot by any metric: volume, mass, alcohol content, nothing.
They are the same in regard to number of people. Each is one person counting for alcohol consumption.
Or we can go with statistics instead of gut reaction.
https://usafacts.org/data-projects/beverages
In the US it’s coffee by a wide margin.
Why are you restricting the scope to some random country, if the comment above doesn’t have such implication?
I suspect it’s the data they happened to find first.
Because it was just the fastest data source I could find. I was simply looking for any counter example. The point wasn’t strictly about the consumption of coffee vs alcohol, it was that there is an entire internet available to confirm or debunk a gut feeling.
So if you’re going to go into a discussion about public policy, back it up with facts and figures, not gut feelings.
So to highlight the point, not to answer it directly? Got it - that’s fair.
As I mentioned in another comment the situation gets a bit more complex when it comes to booze vs. java. For a single country you could theoretically “equalise” things to the most popular booze vs. the most popular way to prepare coffee. So besides data you also need some arbitration, it’s deceptively more complex than it looks like.
We can argue over how to finesse the numbers to most perfectly represent the statistics until we’re blue in the face, but it’s really not that necessary to make it that complicated. Besides 1 serving of coffee is a pretty well established quantity, and 1 serving of alcohol is also a well established quantity. That semantic argument has already been had and settled years ago so that everyone compiling numbers and taking statistics are all operating on the same page.
Not really; unless you’re assuming that your local standards apply elsewhere. They aren’t - this varies wildly. For reference:
It gets worse because coffee is ingested in multiple forms in the same place (refer to the Italian example)
Ditto as above.
This is not just “semantics” or “arguing to finesse the numbers”. What’s meaningful here, in the context of OP (drugs) and the question (alcohol being potentially more consumed than coffee), would be amount of caffeine vs. ethanol, but this isn’t the sort of stuff that you can simply say “learn to use Alphabet Inc.'s data vulturing tool” and call it a day, you know?
Oh so like how there’s an ISO standard for determining caffiene content for use when maming comparisons: https://www.iso.org/standard/34185.html
And the Standard Drink for alcohol: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_drink
You’re splitting hairs and retreading ground that has already be standardized years ago and continually receives updates to maintain relevance.
You’re moving the goalposts.
Your initial take was that you don’t need to rely on gut feeling for this, as [ipsis digitis] “there is an entire internet available to confirm or debunk a gut feeling”. And I’m showing that it isn’t as easy as it looks like, and the very fact that you only brought up international standards later - not right off the bat - shows it.
That said, I encourage you to actually read the second link that you’ve provided:
It actually confirms my point.
Odds are that you’re fully aware that no, I am not “splirring hurrs”.
I’m saying that this should be compared by amounts of alcohol vs. amounts of caffeine, and then arbitrated somehow (say, “x grams of caffeine should be equivalent to x grams of alcohol”). But no, it is not just a “lern2google you baka” as you implied towards the other poster.
EDIT: and it’s blatantly clear that you didn’t even bother to read the first link that you’ve provided. Do it. It does not back up your claim (1 serving of coffee is a pretty well established quantity), it’s about standardisation of quantitative chemistry practices for determination of caffeine content.