• bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    you cannot differentiate between that absolutely wasteful things (like private jets) and things we need in day to day life (like pharmaceuticals).

    The point is to make things that use carbon cost more than things that use less. Some sectors like private aircraft will have people willing to pay whatever because they’re already hugely expensive, but on the larger scales a carbon tax will clean up the vast majority of waste.

    For a few of the worst examples like private jets it’s possible to pass regulation against them, but I’d be very very hesitant to accept the government deciding what is or isn’t wasteful across the board. It’ll be hilariously harmful in the long term.

    And the tax should apply to important things too. We need carbon removed across the whole economy, including medications.