• pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    212
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Corporations: hey guys, let’s unionize so the government doesn’t exploit us.

    Employees: hey, can we als…

    Corporations: NO.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I even upgraded my pipe to fiber so I can share Plex with my friends and family. Built a machine with 16TBx6 RAID. Cost me a shit ton more than a year of all the streaming services but fuck them.

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was talking with a friend over lunch about this. I don’t mind paying for media, but the greed I’m seeing from the streaming services now makes me feel like the more ethical choice is to pirate content and just contribute directly to the arts where I can.

      They’re getting to the point where they think that just because they have the platform and the licenses, they can soak their customers. Only a matter of time before the ad men move in. Anyway, fuck all that

    • spirinolas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never left ye lady-dressin’ barnacle. Leekin’ forward to sail with ye to meet those corporate scallogs for some happy fightin, lootin and rapin’

      R

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I’ve learned anything about corporate lobbying groups it’s that they only exist to fuck you and ruin any legislation that attempts to protect you from them.

    Eat shit SIA.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Corps form “unions” and use money gained by preferential treatment by government to create propaganda shitting on unions.

      Funny that.

      No wait, infuriating. That’s the word.

      • ours@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They cry about the “free market” and then run to the Government to ask for “protection”.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wait, what? What corporations form labor unions designed to undermine labor unions? Are you calling a lobbying group a union? Are you using terminology creatively or is there something I hadn’t heard about? EDIT: I guess I never get to find out. :(

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry for the late reply, I’m not on all the time.

          I was using it creatively which is why I used quotation marks. They act as a collective for their own benefit as a union does.

  • spiderkle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The streaming market is splintered to max and oversaturated by content. The bubble already burst and now people are cordcutting again or fleeing to independent content. Absolutely nobody wants ads back and all companies do is push them on users for ever more revenue. The model only worked because it wasn’t as inconvenient and full of ads as traditional paytv/cable.

    So now we’ve gone full circle and back to lobbies who at some point will undoubtedly create streaming-packages that will include a certain set of partenered services. Can’t wait for the +1000€ per year -T-mobile-package-plan! Apart from Spotify who have kept their “affordable music streaming for 9.99€” promise over the last 10 years…the motion picture models have just become more expensive and user-unfriendly!

    • timkmz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spotify also recently raised their proces, but tbf they kinda had to with the inflation. The depressing thing is that creators are rewarded for borting. (See slightly Sociables “the dark side of spotify” vid for indepth)

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        but tbf they kinda had to with the inflation.

        So, they used inflation as an excuse to charge people more money for an already-profitable product?

        Wow.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Corporations keep talking about inflation as if the regular users aren’t already being screwed by it. “Here, since you have less disposable money, lets charge even more.”

  • Metatronz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    Streaming has ultimately taught me how little I ‘need’ to watch since it trains you to really only seek out a couple things per service. I’ve also become very advertisment sensitive being blessed with tools to avoid that and companies honeymooning people for a while with fewer ads compared to what cable did.

    Obviously, the dipshits are springing their ‘trap’ but I’m not bullish on the strategy of forcing consumers to suddenly tolerate a return of ads everywhere and always on entertainment. I just see folks running away again/further disconnecting from traditional media.

  • Not A Bird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Laws like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which features overly broad definitions of the platforms it targets and has troubling privacy implications thanks to surveillance requirements, could sweep companies like Netflix or Disney up into its dragnet.

    Streaming companies are usually pro-net neutrality, and that’s been a difficult concept for lawmakers and regulators in DC to fully grasp.

    For those that read just the headline. Not everything is black and white.

    • spudwart@spudwart.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every now and again, their interests align with the average person.

      But make no mistake, the companies forming a coalition like this for one or two good causes won’t make up for the long term damage it will no doubt cause.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t matter; they’re controlling media and entertainment and that makes them always bad regardless of any extenuating circumstances.

      All of those problems can be solved by breaking apart all of those corporations, putting all modern franchises in the public domain and legalizing pirating. Change the law solely for our benefit and not theirs. If they don’t make content anymore, great; we’ll shut off their shitty AIs and make shit ourselves like we were supposed to be doing the whole time.

    • Caminsky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is why net neutrality is so important. Back in the days the electromagnetic spectrum was not as heavily regulated as it is now. Technically anyone with the technical know how could set up a broadcasting station. Then CBS, ABC, NBC all got together and did exactly what these companies are doing. They banded together to make it harder for the average person to get access to technology. This is their primariy goal. To give their companies priority at the network level (seconds matter) and also, most likely what they want is to 1. Find ways for their content to be regulated differently and be sold as network packages 2. Probably allow their content to be delivered through means that require people pay THEIR ISPs. Now, i will be honest. I have not read the article but i knlw this has been the intended goal for many years.

      • Aggravationstation@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, the logical next step is sadly for the streaming services to just buy the ISPs with the amount of money they have and lobby so they can block Torrent, Usenet and VPN traffic to stop piracy. Most people will keep paying for the services whilst there’s signs of this happening because they actually believe all the “you wouldn’t steal a car, so why would you steal the 9th shitty Star Wars spin off series” propaganda. Then they’ll block porn tube sites too, for the children of course. The first one to do it will get all of the Christians on-side immediately who will accuse the others of being evil and allowing such awful filth so the others will quickly follow suit. After time passes I’m sure they’ll bring out their own almost porn type content that will prove very popular. I could be wrong, but it’ll be interesting to see how things turn out.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the famous quote? Something about how a capitalist will sell you the rope from which you plan to hang them? Something like that?

  • TGQP@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine missing the point so completely. Streaming, what a joke now.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s almost never a pricing issue, but a service issue. They can band together in their bullshit campaign all they want. They’re still not getting my money, because I’m not paying 15 a month, to watch one movie with 7 ads, after which they’ll also sell my data

  • Skybreaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Netflix and others look for power in number$.

    Welcome to the United $tate$ of America, people; Where money is the only thing that matters

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guess we have to band together then as well.

      Don’t forget to seed your torrents!

  • underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could they, instead, band together to offer a service that’s more user friendly than piracy? I suppose bribery is cheaper and easier.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      They did, it was called Netflix.

      Then the Netflix rates went up while everyone pulled and splintered content onto their own services and then started shuffling it around.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine not being able to force set the resolution and bitrate on your stream, even tho you pay for 4k. (Btw. Same goes for YT) Plex and jellyfin are just superior.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What client do you use? I mostly use the iOS client and there they only give you the illusion of a choice: „higher quality“ and „lower quality“ maybe there are still clients which allow force set resolution/bitrate.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you’re asking for is a monopoly. It rarely is cheaper or easier. Sometimes, when heavily regulated, it could be. But history shows most of these are eventually privatized and deregulated and then we know what happens.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t put words in my mouth. Industries get together and set standards and form partnerships all the fucking time. It’s as much a “monopoly” as this lobbying project is.

  • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Checkout streamio

    You’ll definitely stop paying these streaming giants.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude everything on that site was pay for or made you go different apps and pay subscription. Streamio is BS.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          60
          ·
          1 year ago

          Its still illegal. Don’t pretend your actions hold some sort of moral high ground. If you disagree with the law go change it.

          • Zhao@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            39
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m fine being on the low end of the moral scale “stealing” from the rich lol.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              34
              ·
              1 year ago

              You don’t have to respect any laws. That’s your progitive. However, don’t claim a moral high ground

              • Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see what you’re getting at, but I think ‘moral high ground’ might not be the phrase you’re looking for.

                Laws and morals are explicitly different. That’s why juries exist, so that a law may be put against the morals of a situation and the morals may prevail if need be.

                Breaking the law isn’t necessarily immoral. It’s just illegal. So it isn’t like someone breaking the law is seeking to take the moral high ground in the first place, nor does that mean that someone who only ever follows the law always has the moral high ground. Lawful-evil does exist.

              • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t care about the moral high ground. Large corporations can go fuck themselves, seeing as they fuck us every day.