• Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Do you imply that US should not help Ukrane to defend themselves against Russia?

    • m532@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Telling all ukrainians to go die in war for the yanks is not “helping them”.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thinking someone is defending their homeland “for the yanks” is a smoothbrain take

        • Nocturne Dragonite@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Thinking someone is “defending their homeland” when they’ve been shelling civilians since 2014 is even worse whew I can see my reflection with that kinda smooth

        • m532@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nuland = yank

          Nuland’s hand-picked gov works for the yanks.

          If you don’t understand this, it is you who is the smoothbrain.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Are you aware there not one but two previous attempts at negotiations that Ukraine purposedly sabotaged on their own? Are you even aware Merkel literaly admitted the Minsk agreements were merely attempts to buy time and prepare Ukraine for war.

      You can read the terms here

      All the more remarkable is her admission that the Minsk agreement served to buy time for Ukraine’s rearmament. “It was clear to all of us that this was a frozen conflict, that the problem had not been solved, but that is precisely what gave Ukraine valuable time,” Merkel told Die Zeit.

      Previously, the Minsk agreement, which Merkel signed together with then-French President François Hollande, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and Russian President Vladimir Putin in September 2014, had been portrayed as an effort towards peace that the Russian president had allegedly later thwarted.

      Now, Merkel confirms that NATO wanted war from the start but needed time to prepare militarily—an assessment WSWS has long held.

      Russia negotiated in good faith while NATO never had any intention of honoring negotiation terms agreed by Ukraine.

      Yes quite literaly if NATO stayed the fuck out of Ukraine there wouldn’t be any war, literaly once again, they purposedly broke the agreements which were meant to prevent war and de-escalate.

      Minsk 1 was in 2014. Then there was a second Minsk agreement in 2015.

      Please for the love of god don’t parachute into this war as if history began in February 2022 I beg you.

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ah yes. The famous Russian good faith and NATO forcing their hand into genocides.

        • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          From where any logical and sane person is sitting, only one side commited a historical blunder of actualy admitting to the media that the Donbas war was a “frozen conflict” when in reality there were already peace agreements between both sides.

          Go complain to Merkel for making you look bad. You don’t have to believe in Russian good faith if you don’t want to, all that is necessary is to admit the actual reality of what happened and what was admitted by the west already.

            • Nocturne Dragonite@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Say, can you tell me why Russia “invaded” Ukraine and not any of its other much weaker neighbors? I bet you think the conflict started in 2022

      • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        All Russian negotiations rely on the agreement for Ukrane to give up a part of invaded lands. That is not going to happen, especially after Crimea in 2014. Russia has no claim to the lands and any negotiations that require them are a joke.

        If Russia is not stopped no agreement will be final, it’s all about the ambition to rebuild the Soviet Union and “compromise” won’t do it.

        Of course NATO will not directly engage in this war (as sad as it is), that would result in WWIII. It is convieniet for NATO nations that the conflict is in Ukrane, but that does not change the fact Ukrane needs and is getting support indirectly, because NATO has an interest in Ukrane winning.

        Comparing that to China’s “priority” for infrastructure in the original post is at best unfair. And while arms racing in general is not a good thing, the original post lumps that together with support for Ukrane. That is the message I take issue with.

        • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          All Russian negotiations rely on the agreement for Ukrane to give up a part of invaded lands. That is not going to happen, especially after Crimea in 2014. Russia has no claim to the lands and any negotiations that require them are a joke.

          What are you even talking about? Seriously what part of terms agreed by Ukraine you didn’t understand? Please for the love of god actualy read about the stuff you’re commenting before replying, thank you.

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Comparing that to China’s “priority” for infrastructure in the original post is at best unfair. And while arms racing in general is not a good thing, the original post lumps that together with support for Ukrane. That is the message I take issue with.

          Okay, that’s a fair point.

          If Russia is not stopped no agreement will be final, it’s all about the ambition to rebuild the Soviet Union and “compromise” won’t do it.

          But what evidence do you have to support this? We have a short and long term history to look at showing NATO going back on their promises, lying, sowing chaos. Russia by comparison has been reliable. Isn’t the fair thing then to try to make the compromise survive as long as possible? Because the alternative to compromise is people dying. Even if it’s none of your friends, surely you don’t want Russians dying either, right?

      • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, but also yes. It does prolong the war, but it also helps to save civilians and push back against an aggressor.

        • notceps [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          How does it help? Explain to me how supporting Ukraine a country that at this point now just forcibly conscripts anyone helps civilians. Have you talked to any Ukrainian women that had to flee from this conflict and that they haven’t hear anything about their husbands brothers and fathers? Were those people not civilians? Or are Ukrainian lives just not a thing? I guess it helps if Ukraine has less and less actual civilians because more and more have to get drafted into the army so some assholes can send another thousand poor people to walk across a minefield to get blown up after all if they are in the army they are no longer civilians.

          You know who it does help? US military contractors. Ukraine has received 76.8bn USD in 2022 from the USA this isn’t counting various loans that I’m sure aren’t going to be used against Ukraine to force them to privatize everything and enforce austerity policies. EU countries sent double that 140bn USD

          This is in one year from one country, we could end world hunger with a yearly investment of 23bn USD to 40bn USD, this would actually undeniably help save civilians, in fact it would save at least three times as much because the population of ukraine is something under 50mil while the population currently suffering from severe hunger is 150mil.

          The only reason why you’ve been told that this saves civilians and not you know anything else is because again selling weapons is big business and the only way governments can spend money now I guess, so yes lets save those civilians by forcing them at gunpoint to go walk into a minefield so more and more and more and more and more blood can be fed into this another horrifiyng war to fight over imaginary lines because USA liberty guns or whatever wants their stock to go up.

          If you truly believe in this shit, I think this is more of an online cheerleading thing for you, you should join up and fight the aggressor and prevent putin from doing a genocide or whatever.

          • el_bhm@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes, and remember that Russia will absolutely not invade another country.

          • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh I don’t know, maybe because the same exact thing happened with Crimea. All out war didn’t start, but peope died, homes were destroyed and Russia became a little bigger.

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Russia will of course stop out of goodness of their little hearts.

        They will not follow up to Poland and Baltics.

        • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ukraine either loses, or they keep fighting and a whole lot more people die and then they lose. Which is better?

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes. The exact point of this ampliganda.

      You can pull up crazy numbers China are pushing for building their Navy and contrast it with EU spending on infrastructure and post-COVID investments.