I’m referring to posts like this https://lemmy.world/comment/3061756
If people are just asking questions about what it says, I have no issue with that. But I saw none of that at the time of my post.
I am some guy
I’m referring to posts like this https://lemmy.world/comment/3061756
If people are just asking questions about what it says, I have no issue with that. But I saw none of that at the time of my post.
The amount of people that either cannot read or cannot fathom that their preconceived notion of how this legislation will work is much too high. And the cockiness of their demeanor…
The payments end when both criteria are met. The minor turns 18 and they have graduated high school.
It is in the legislation. Read it before you respond. https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/HB00393I.htm
They may not need to pay after the recipient is 19.
To all those people that wanted so desperately to get people to leave Reddit and come here, congratulations. It’s apparently working. Good job.
You’d have to edit the article and even the legislation too then. https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/HB00393I.htm
Because they both say that too.
Lol. It’s bold for a reason. Because it’s intentionally highlighting this aspect of the new legislation.
There are edit and even delete buttons. Give them a whirl.
Am I misunderstanding “until the child is 18 or graduates high school, whichever is later”?
Reeeaaally getting some Reddit vibes when the person that seems to have read the synopsis, at least, is getting down voted for it…
It IS 2023, so who knows?
Kudos to those that own the LIBS.
I feel like this article was written to try to keep docker desktop relevant now that people are ditching it for more commercially affordable UI options.
As if to suggest you’re not using docker without it. The cli works fine. But there’s also rancher desktop, portainer, podman, etc.
That is a good point, and we’re committed to understanding your perspective. Would you be interested in taking part in a potentially paid survey with Prescott Networking, where we stand by the principles of maximizing shareholder port… sustainable dialog about policy?
What the hell does this have to do with the Wizard of Oz?
Edit: man it took awhile to notice this is about OPs username. God I’m so fuckin tired of online political discourse.
Exposure to famous actors is stronger than that of comedians. When you first noticed them is affected by this. I’m pretty sure that’s what’s going on here.
Patch Adams too.
WHAT
Yeah it gave me a clear recommendation for nixos which I use. But it’s rationale about many distros I’ve enjoyed in the past were suspect as hell, acting like they had big marks against them because they don’t update often, when I said that I preferred stability.
I don’t get it
I’ve had to tolerate summers like that. It’d be hard to CHOOSE to for me though.
I get the sentiment, but this isn’t just a joke misspell. It’s racial.
There are plenty of oversensitive reactions to say this to but this isn’t one.
It’s a good principle. If you go into that thinking you’ll see a modicum of return on investment, you’re gonna lose heart and just get more bitter.
You follow that thinking because it’s who you want to be despite the world you live in. I wish it acted as a catalyst. It doesn’t.
deleted by creator