House flies start producing potent methamphetamine in their wings, which means the whole world has uncontrollable access to it.
House flies start producing potent methamphetamine in their wings, which means the whole world has uncontrollable access to it.
This proof is partial though. This assumes there is only 1 way of obtaining lead. What if lead appeared from fusion in stars younger than that.
C’est pour discuter honnêtement ou juste pour répéter qu’on lit la situation de façon opposé? J’ai pas trop envie, je voulais juste dire qu’on semble pas voir la même réalité. Les gens sont rapides à ignorer la vision de l’autre.
The whole mental health angle is reaching a bit far, but if anyone actually invokes it, I wouldn’t fight back. Like sure, you don’t want comment clashes, I can understand, I won’t trigger them.
I just have a problem with considering the whole hexbear instance as toxic and ideologically dubious. I get why someone might feel like that, but seeing 5 top level comments repeating it when I just don’t believe it’s true, I felt like adding my grain of salt.
We sit at the same table to try and bring the left together. I don’t care about helping Hexbear, I just wanna interest random users to challenge their views like I do. I have to work at standing up to others, true, but I haven’t encountered slurs, calls to violence or troll behavior from Hexbear, at least none that haven’t been resolved properly (though I’m sure it can happen).
Sometimes you express a view that’s untrue or that lacks empathy and get called out for it. It feels insulting when it happens, but I doesn’t have to be.
I’m not “my colleagues” and I don’t speak for them. If replying a simple “lol” to something of substance feels wrong, you could avoid doing it. My experience there makes me believe the lol user must have responded to something useless or disconnected from reality.
Isn’t the studied time frame extremely small?
I think the content on hexbear is interesting and it’s bad to alienate new users of what they might find there. I reread the old post and the issues are being conflated in the comments here, I just don’t see what is being described here. Sure the bickering gets harsh deep in the comments, but that’s just the internet. People explain themselves sufficently well. That’s it.
Pretty sure it’s Adam Driver
This feels very important. I think it’s a core reflexion on why some means are acceptable once the material conditions have degraded enough. In general, when a fight is just, I tend to reflect twice before condemning alleged “violence”, including light stuff like breaking park benches or lamp posts which is heavily demonized in the media, let alone popular liberation armies around the world.
Not related to the movies themselves but I remember from the original Spider-Man run in the first 100 issues, Spidey goes to a prison riot and understands the guards are the abusers and supports the formation of the inmates union iirc
Super Metroid. The game really opens up if you spend a bit of time learning alternate routes and sequence breaks. Many of them are kind of easy too. Besides all that, I just feel weirdly cozy in the depths or outside in the rain. It’s also a shortish randomizer if you go outside of the vanilla experience with like 100 places to check.
I don’t think you can achieve a spiral orbit in an area with so little friction, mostly devoid of dust and gas, else the earth would be on one of those too…
Cant access the article, here’s a dumb AI summary “The article by David Fickling on Bloomberg Law discusses China’s electric vehicle (EV) subsidy system. Fickling argues that China can’t reduce its EV subsidies because it isn’t actually paying them in full. While the Chinese government provides financial incentives to encourage the growth of the EV industry, much of the support is being delayed or deferred, and in some cases, the payments are not made at all. The article highlights the gap between China’s ambitious EV targets and the practical realities of its financial commitments, pointing out that many EV companies rely on the promise of subsidies, even though the actual funds have often not been disbursed as expected. This reliance on delayed payments could undermine the sustainability of the industry and the broader transition to electric vehicles.”